Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
Published on: March 8, 2024
Protocol for an economic evaluation of WHO STOPS childhood obesity stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial
Rohan Sweeney1,2,3, Marj Moodie1,2, Phuong Nguyen1,2
1Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Insights
This study evaluates the Whole of Systems Trial Of Prevention Strategies for childhood obesity (WHO STOPS) intervention. It assesses the economic impact and cost-effectiveness of community-led strategies to prevent childhood obesity.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Pediatric Health
Background:
- Childhood overweight and obesity pose significant health system burdens.
- Prevention requires multi-level, multi-actor strategies.
- Systems-based interventions offer a novel approach to community-wide prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the planned economic evaluation of the WHO STOPS intervention.
- To examine methodological challenges in evaluating complex, systems-based public health interventions.
- To assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a community-led childhood obesity prevention program.
Main Methods:
- Economic evaluation alongside a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.
- Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses (cost per BMI unit saved, cost per QALY gained).
- Markov cohort modeling for life-course cost savings and benefits, including community resource valuation.
Main Results:
- The study will estimate incremental costs and health gains (BMI units, QALYs).
- It will project long-term healthcare cost savings and benefits.
- Sensitivity analyses will assess the robustness of findings to variations in parameters.
Conclusions:
- The economic evaluation will provide crucial data on the value of systems-based obesity prevention.
- Methodological insights will inform future evaluations of complex public health interventions.
- Findings will guide policy decisions regarding childhood obesity prevention strategies.
Introduction:
Prevention of overweight and obesity in childhood is a priority because of associated acute and chronic conditions in childhood and later in life, which place significant burden on health systems. Evidence suggests prevention should engage a range of actions and actors and target multiple levels. The Whole of Systems Trial Of Prevention Strategies for childhood obesity (WHO STOPS) will evaluate the outcomes of a novel systems-based intervention that aims to engage whole communities in a locally led multifaceted response. This paper describes the planned economic evaluation of WHO STOPS and examines the methodological challenges for economic evaluation of a complex systems-based intervention.
Methods And Analysis:
Economic evaluation alongside a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial in regional and rural communities in Victoria, Australia. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will provide estimates of the incremental cost (in $A) per body mass index unit saved and quality adjusted life year gained. A Markov cohort model will be employed to estimate healthcare cost savings and benefits over the life course of children. The dollar value of community resources harnessed for the community-led response will be estimated. Probabilistic uncertainty analyses will be undertaken to test sensitivity of results to plausible variations in all trial-based and modelled variables. WHO STOPS will also be assessed against other implementation considerations (such as sustainability and acceptability to communities and other stakeholders).
Ethics And Dissemination:
The trial is registered by the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000980437). Full ethics clearances have been received for all methods described below: Deakin University's Human Research Ethics Committee 2014-279, Deakin University's Human Ethics Advisory Group-Health (HEAG-H) HEAG-H 194_2014, HEAG-H 17 2015, HEAG-H 155_2014, HEAG-H 197_2016, HEAG-H 118_2017, the Victorian Department of Education and Training 2015_002622 and the Catholic Archdiocese of Ballarat. Trial findings (including economic evaluation) will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. Collected data and analyses will be made available in accordance with journal policies and study ethics approvals. Results will be presented to relevant government authorities with an interest in cost-effectiveness of these types of interventions.
Trial Registration Number:
ACTRN12616000980437; Pre-results.
More Related Videos
06:13Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
11:16Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
Published on: July 22, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Wedges
Consider using a wedge to lift a heavy slab. Here, the wedge functions by converting the applied force into a much larger force directed almost perpendicular to the initial force. This...
Obesity
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...