Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correlations02:20

Correlations

36.5K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
36.5K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

42.9K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
42.9K
Correlation01:09

Correlation

15.2K
In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
15.2K
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder01:30

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

1.0K
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. It affects approximately 5-8% of children globally, with around 60-70% of cases persisting into adulthood. ADHD has significant implications for educational attainment, social interactions, and occupational success.
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
1.0K
Correlation and Regression00:53

Correlation and Regression

3.5K
In statistics, correlation describes the degree of association between two variables. In the subfield of linear regression, correlation is mathematically expressed by the correlation coefficient, which describes the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. The coefficient is symbolically represented by 'r' and ranges from -1 to +1. A positive value indicates a positive correlation where the two variables move in the same direction. A negative value suggests a...
3.5K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

8.7K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
8.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial: Well-being and cognitive science in higher education: measures and intervention.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Sustainable bioactive composite films from agro-waste cellulose and chitosan reinforced with green-synthesized hydroxyapatite.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026
Same author

Editorial: Transdiagnostic approach in studying mental health conditions: the contribution of fundamental and translational brain research for precise interventions.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Phosphorus-Induced Changes in Microstructure, Optical, and Tribological Behavior of Electrodeposited Ni-P Coatings.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Executive dysfunction as a transdiagnostic mechanism of psychopathology: a neurocognitive framework for diagnosis and intervention.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Quality of life in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: the role of psychosocial, inflammatory, and dopaminergic pathways.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.5K

Mind Wandering and Task-Focused Attention: ERP Correlates.

Óscar F Gonçalves1,2,3, Gabriel Rêgo4, Tatiana Conde4,5

  • 1Psychological Neuroscience Laboratory- CIPsi, School of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. goncalves@psi.uminho.pt.

Scientific Reports
|May 17, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mind wandering (MW) does not affect attention task performance or underlying brain activity. This study found no distinct cortical processing differences between individuals focusing on MW or focused attention (FA) during attention network tasks (ANT).

More Related Videos

Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats
09:31

Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats

Published on: September 15, 2017

10.3K
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

47.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.5K
Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats
09:31

Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats

Published on: September 15, 2017

10.3K
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

47.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurophysiology

Background:

  • Previous research indicates mind wandering (MW) doesn't impair behavioral performance on the Attention Network Task (ANT).
  • However, the neurophysiological underpinnings of this lack of interference remain unclear.
  • It's hypothesized that distinct cortical processing might be necessary for attentional demands during MW.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if individuals predominantly experiencing MW or focused attention (FA) exhibit different cortical processing during ANT performance.
  • To determine if behavioral observations of MW's lack of interference have neurophysiological correlates.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-three healthy participants performed the ANT while undergoing high-density electroencephalography (EEG) acquisition.
  • Mind wandering (MW) levels were assessed post-task using an adapted Resting State Questionnaire (ReSQ).
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs), including pN1, pP1, P1, N1, pN, and P3, were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Behaviorally, participants showed expected conflict, alerting, and orienting effects on the ANT.
  • ERP analyses revealed distinct neural signatures for these attentional effects.
  • Crucially, these neurophysiological differences persisted regardless of the participant's MW condition, indicating no additional cortical demand.

Conclusions:

  • Mind wandering (MW) does not impose additional cortical demands during the performance of alert, orienting, and conflict attention tasks.
  • The lack of behavioral interference from MW during ANT performance is supported by consistent neurophysiological findings.
  • Focused attention (FA) and mind wandering (MW) states do not necessitate distinct cortical processing for standard attention network tasks.