Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: The Box-Cavity Cortical Approach for Enhanced Evaluation of Biomaterials and Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 21, 2023
The laparoscopic inguinal and diaphragmatic defect (LIDD) model: a validation study of a novel box trainer model
Damir Ljuhar1,2,3, Samuel Alexander4, Sarah Martin5
1Department of Paediatric Surgery, Monash Children's Hospital, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. dljuhar@gmail.com.
Insights
The Laparoscopic Inguinal and Diaphragmatic Defect (LIDD) model effectively validates surgical simulation for paediatric laparoscopic procedures. This novel tool demonstrates construct and content validity, differentiating skill levels in inguinal hernia and diaphragmatic hernia repair.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Simulation
- Medical Education
- Paediatric Surgery
Background:
- Paediatric laparoscopic procedures are increasingly common, necessitating safe training environments.
- Simulated models are crucial for developing part-procedural competency before patient contact.
- The Laparoscopic Inguinal and Diaphragmatic Defect (LIDD) model was developed for paediatric inguinal hernia (IH) and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair simulation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the construct and content validity of the novel LIDD surgical simulation model.
- To evaluate the model's effectiveness in training for paediatric laparoscopic IH and CDH repair.
Main Methods:
- 107 participants (medical students, surgical trainees, experts) underwent validation testing.
- Participants performed simulated laparoscopic IH and CDH repairs, assessed with a novel scoring system.
- Content validity was evaluated by experts using a 6-point Likert scale.
Main Results:
- The LIDD model demonstrated significant score differences between novices, trainees, and experts for both IH and CDH repairs.
- Experts achieved significantly higher scores than trainees and novices (p < 0.05).
- The model showed high expert-rated potential (4.8/6) and functional fidelity (4.0/6) for task completion.
Conclusions:
- The LIDD model is a valid simulation tool for paediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia and diaphragmatic hernia repair.
- The model successfully differentiates skill levels among inexperienced, trainee, and expert laparoscopic surgeons.
- Further refinement may be needed to distinguish skill levels within the intermediate trainee group.
Background:
Paediatric laparoscopic procedures are now becoming routine practice. Therefore, there is a need for simulated laparoscopic models to acquire part-procedural competency prior to direct patient contact in a safe learning environment. For this reason, we chose two paediatric conditions; inguinal hernia (IH) and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), which were combined to create the laparoscopic inguinal and diaphragmatic defect (LIDD) model. Our aim was to assess this novel surgical simulation model by determining its construct and content validity.
Methods:
A total of 107 participants completed the validation study: volunteer medical students (novices), surgical trainees (intermediate) and consultant surgeons (experts). Basic demographic data were collected. Subjects were shown a pre-recorded video of both exercises. The assessment exercise involved closing both the simulated inguinal or diaphragmatic hernial orifice. The task was assessed using a novel scoring system with a maximum score of 21 for IH model and 15 for the CDH. The content validity was assessed by a 6-point Likert scale of the expert group.
Results:
105/107 participants successfully completed the two exercises. Both aspects of the LIDD model revealed a statistical significance between the scores obtained by the three groups of subjects. Experts scored 20.3/21 for the IH and 14.8/15 for the CDH models which significantly higher than medical students (6.3/21 and 5.3/15; p < 0.05 for both) and trainees (11.2/21 and 9.3/15; p < 0.05 for both). Similarly, trainees performed significantly better than medical students in both models (p < 0.05). Therefore, the LIDD model was found to have a good construct validity. It was, however, unable to differentiate between the various levels of trainees in the intermediate group. Content validity from the experts revealed that there was a high score for the potential of both aspects of LIDD (4.8 and 4.8). There was also a high level of functional fidelity for task completion (4.0 and 4.0).
Conclusions:
We have demonstrated both the construct and content validity of the LIDD model for both laparoscopic IH and CDH repair. It was able to successfully differentiate between the expert, trainees and inexperienced laparoscopic surgeons.
Related Concept Videos
Typical Model Studies
Reliability and Validity
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Molecular Models
Lumber Defects
Shakes are minor fractures that run along or across the wood's annual rings, while wane is...
The Bohr Model

