Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
Published on: May 6, 2020
Long-term Durability of Infrainguinal Endovascular and Open Revascularization for Disabling Claudication
Sikandar Z Khan1, Mariel Rivero2, Gregory S Cherr1
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Insights
Infrainguinal revascularization for disabling claudication shows good long-term success with both open and endovascular interventions. However, complex disease (TASC II C/D) necessitates high reintervention rates and may eventually require surgical bypass.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Peripheral Artery Disease
Background:
- Infrainguinal revascularization is common for disabling claudication (DC).
- Long-term outcomes of endovascular (EV) versus open interventions for DC remain under investigation.
- This study compares clinical outcomes after medical management failure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of infrainguinal endovascular (EV) and open interventions for disabling claudication (DC).
- To evaluate patency, primary clinical success (PCS), and secondary clinical success (SCS) rates.
- To assess the impact of disease complexity (TASC II classification) on intervention outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 194 patients with DC (Rutherford category 3) undergoing open or EV interventions.
- Patients were grouped by intervention type: open-great saphenous vein (GSV), open-prosthetic, EV-TASC II A/B (AB), and EV-TASC II C/D (CD).
- Outcomes measured included patency, PCS, SCS, freedom from major adverse limb events, and reintervention rates over a mean follow-up of 57 months.
Main Results:
- Five-year primary patency was highest in EV-AB (72%) and lowest in open-prosthetic (40%).
- Five-year secondary patency was highest in EV-AB (96%) and lowest in open-prosthetic (50%).
- Five-year PCS was highest in EV-AB (57%), while SCS was high across all groups (77-85%). High reintervention rates were observed, particularly for TASC II C/D disease.
Conclusions:
- Durability of infrainguinal interventions for claudication is influenced by disease complexity.
- Both open and EV interventions can achieve good long-term success but involve high reintervention rates, especially for TASC II C/D.
- A significant portion of EV patients, particularly those with TASC II C/D disease, may eventually require surgical bypass for sustained benefit.
Background:
Infrainguinal revascularization for disabling claudication (DC) is frequently performed, but long-term results are still unknown. In this study, we compared clinical outcomes of infrainguinal endovascular (EV) and open interventions for DC after the failure of medical management.
Methods:
One hundred ninety-four patients with DC (Rutherford category 3) who had open (n = 53) or EV (n = 141) interventions were grouped as open-great saphenous vein (GSV) (n = 21), open-prosthetic (n = 32), EV-Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) A and B (AB) (n = 48), and EV-TASC II C and D (CD) (n = 93). Patency, primary clinical success (PCS; sustained improvement in symptoms without reintervention), and secondary clinical success (SCS; sustained improvement in symptoms with reintervention) rates were compared.
Results:
Mean follow-up was 57 ± 33 months. Five-year primary patency was 58% in open-GSV, 40% in open-prosthetic, 72% in EV-AB, and 38% in EV-CD (P < 0.001). Five-year secondary patency was 77% in open-GSV, 50% in open-prosthetic, 96% in EV-AB, and 61% in EV-CD (P < 0.001). Freedom from major adverse limb events was 73% in open-GSV, 77% in EV-AB, 70% in EV-CD, and 67% in open-prosthetic (P = 0.279). Five-year PCS was 46% in open-GSV, 40% in open-prosthetic, 57% in EV-AB, and 44% in EV-CD (P = 0.02). Five-year SCS was 78% in open-GSV, 78% in open-prosthetic, 85% in EV-AB, and 84% in EV-CD (P = 0.732). A total of 116 reinterventions were performed, 10 in 6 limbs (27%) in open-GSV, 18 in 12 limbs (36%) in open-prosthetic, 26 in 15 limbs (24%) in EV-AB, and 62 in 39 limbs (36%) in EV-CD. Reinterventions included 71 (61%) EV and 45 (39%) open procedures.
Conclusions:
Durability of infrainguinal interventions in claudicants depends mainly on anatomic complexity of disease. Good long-term clinical success can be achieved with both open and EV interventions, albeit with high reintervention rates, especially in patients with TASC II C and D disease. A considerable subset of EV patients will eventually require surgical revascularization to maintain clinical benefit. In this study, almost 20% of patients undergoing EV for TASC II C and D disease eventually required surgical bypass.
More Related Videos
08:11Measuring Progressive Neurological Disability in a Mouse Model of Multiple Sclerosis
Published on: November 14, 2016
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Intellectual Disability
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Brick Durability, Strength, and Appearance
Long-term Depression
Long-term Depression
Calcium Ion Concentration Mechanism
If over...
Long-term Potentiation