Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution01:14

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution

2.4K
Near absolute zero temperatures, in the presence of a magnetic field, the majority of nuclei prefer the lower energy spin-up state to the higher energy spin-down state. As temperatures increase, the energy from thermal collisions distributes the spins more equally between the two states. The Boltzmann distribution equation gives the ratio of the number of spins predicted in the spin −½ (N−) and spin +½ (N+) states.
2.4K
Emission Spectra02:39

Emission Spectra

76.5K
When solids, liquids, or condensed gases are heated sufficiently, they radiate some of the excess energy as light. Photons produced in this manner have a range of energies, and thereby produce a continuous spectrum in which an unbroken series of wavelengths is present.
76.5K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.3K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.3K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
Conservation of Small Populations02:04

Conservation of Small Populations

17.4K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
17.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to "Comment on 'Distinct Populations in Spin-Label EPR Spectra from Nitroxides'".

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2019
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

11.1K

Distinct Populations in Spin-Label EPR Spectra from Nitroxides.

Derek Marsh1

  • 1Max-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie , Am Fassberg 11 , 37077 Göttingen , Germany.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B
|May 19, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of nitroxide spin labels are crucial for studying lipid-protein interactions. This study clarifies that apparent two-component EPR spectra are actually single-component powder patterns, not indicative of two distinct molecular populations.

More Related Videos

In Vivo EPR Assessment of pH, pO2, Redox Status, and Concentrations of Phosphate and Glutathione in the Tumor Microenvironment
10:46

In Vivo EPR Assessment of pH, pO2, Redox Status, and Concentrations of Phosphate and Glutathione in the Tumor Microenvironment

Published on: March 16, 2018

8.8K
EPR Monitored Redox Titration of the Cofactors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nar1
06:01

EPR Monitored Redox Titration of the Cofactors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nar1

Published on: November 26, 2014

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

11.1K
In Vivo EPR Assessment of pH, pO2, Redox Status, and Concentrations of Phosphate and Glutathione in the Tumor Microenvironment
10:46

In Vivo EPR Assessment of pH, pO2, Redox Status, and Concentrations of Phosphate and Glutathione in the Tumor Microenvironment

Published on: March 16, 2018

8.8K
EPR Monitored Redox Titration of the Cofactors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nar1
06:01

EPR Monitored Redox Titration of the Cofactors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nar1

Published on: November 26, 2014

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biophysical Chemistry
  • Spectroscopy
  • Membrane Biophysics

Background:

  • Two-component nitroxide spin-label electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra are vital for analyzing lipid-protein interactions, membrane phase separation, and protein conformational changes.
  • Previous interpretations suggested these spectra arise from distinct molecular populations, based on single-site model simulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the interpretation of two-component nitroxide spin-label EPR spectra.
  • To determine if simulations from prior studies accurately represent experimental observations of lipid membranes.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectral simulations.
  • Comparison of simulated spectra with experimental data from spin-labeled lipids in fluid-bilayer membranes.
  • Utilized motional models and parameters to assess spectral line shapes.

Main Results:

  • Simulations using parameters from a previous study do not reproduce the claimed two-component line shapes.
  • Observed spectra are consistent with single-component powder patterns arising from axially anisotropic, partial motional-averaging.
  • This spectral behavior is explained by the nitroxide z-axis orientation and slow motion perpendicular to the diffusion axis.

Conclusions:

  • There is no basis in simulation or experiment to assert that single-component nitroxyl EPR spectra resemble two-component spectra.
  • The findings support the interpretation of spectra as single-component powder patterns, reflecting specific lipid dynamics within membranes.
  • This clarification is essential for accurate analysis of lipid-protein interactions and membrane properties using EPR spectroscopy.