Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Brain Source Imaging in Preclinical Rat Models of Focal Epilepsy using High-Resolution EEG Recordings
Published on: June 6, 2015
Modelling the delay between pharmacokinetics and EEG effects of morphine in rats: binding kinetic versus effect
Wilhelmus E A de Witte1, Vivi Rottschäfer2, Meindert Danhof1
1Division of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Drug-target binding kinetics (as determined by association and dissociation rate constants, kon and koff) can be an important determinant of the kinetics of drug action. However, the effect compartment model is used most frequently instead of a target binding model to describe hysteresis. Here we investigate when the drug-target binding model should be used in lieu of the effect compartment model. The utility of the effect compartment (EC), the target binding kinetics (TB) and the combined effect compartment-target binding kinetics (EC-TB) model were tested on either plasma (ECPL, TBPL and EC-TBPL) or brain extracellular fluid (ECF) (ECECF, TBECF and EC-TBECF) morphine concentrations and EEG amplitude in rats. It was also analyzed when a significant shift in the time to maximal target occupancy (TmaxTO) with increasing dose, the discriminating feature between the TB and EC model, occurs in the TB model. All TB models assumed a linear relationship between target occupancy and drug effect on the EEG amplitude. All three model types performed similarly in describing the morphine pharmacodynamics data, although the EC model provided the best statistical result. The analysis of the shift in TmaxTO (∆TmaxTO) as a result of increasing dose revealed that ∆TmaxTO is decreasing towards zero if the koff is much smaller than the elimination rate constant or if the target concentration is larger than the initial morphine concentration. The results for the morphine PKPD modelling and the analysis of ∆TmaxTO indicate that the EC and TB models do not necessarily lead to different drug effect versus time curves for different doses if a delay between drug concentrations and drug effect (hysteresis) is described. Drawing mechanistic conclusions from successfully fitting one of these two models should therefore be avoided. Since the TB model can be informed by in vitro measurements of kon and koff, a target binding model should be considered more often for mechanistic modelling purposes.
Related Concept Videos
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding
Compartment Models: Single-Compartment Model
Three-Compartment Open Model
Drug Distribution as One-Compartment Model and Elimination by Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Overview
For instance, consider the metabolism of sodium salicylate. This compound is metabolized into two distinct substances: a glucuronide and a glycine conjugate. The rate of conjugation depends...

