Challenges in Implementation of Institutional Protocols for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Atman P Shah1, Sandeep Nathan1
1Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Insights
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management has improved, but remains a public health burden. Developing institutional protocols can reduce care variability and enhance patient outcomes for ACS, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Healthcare Management
Background:
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), encompassing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI, and unstable angina, significantly impacts public health.
- Recent advancements in pharmacological and interventional therapies, alongside updated treatment guidelines, have improved outcomes for ACS patients.
- Despite progress, considerable public health burden persists, with significant variations in treatment practices and adherence, particularly for non-ST-segment elevation ACS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the process for developing and implementing institutional protocols for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patient care.
- To address the variability in treatment patterns and adherence observed in ACS management.
- To improve the quality of care, efficiency, and patient outcomes through standardized institutional protocols.
Main Methods:
- Discussion of the development and implementation process for institutional protocols.
- Focus on a comprehensive approach from initial medical contact through discharge and beyond.
- Emphasis on addressing variations in care for both STEMI and non-ST-segment elevation ACS.
Main Results:
- Institutional protocols can decrease variability in practice patterns for ACS care.
- Standardized protocols have the potential to improve the quality of care and efficiency.
- Implementation of protocols aims to ultimately enhance patient outcomes in ACS management.
Conclusions:
- Developing and implementing institutional protocols is crucial for standardizing ACS care.
- Protocols can mitigate practice variations and improve efficiency and patient outcomes.
- A systematic approach to protocol development and implementation is essential for managing the public health burden of ACS.
Abstract:
The diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation ACS (non-STEMI and unstable angina). In recent years, there have been improvements in the rates of death, cardiogenic shock, and recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with ACS, primarily due to the introduction of new pharmacological and interventional therapies, as well as the introduction of and adherence to new treatment guidelines. However, ACS still represents a considerable public health burden. Treatment recommendations for STEMI and non-ST-segment elevation differ and there is wide variation in practice patterns and adherence among and within hospitals especially for the latter diagnosis. Adoption of institutional protocols may help decrease variability and improve quality of care, efficiency, and, ultimately, patient outcomes. This report discusses the process of developing and implementing institutional protocols for patients with ACS, from initial medical contact to discharge and beyond.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
01:26Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
01:30Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
01:28Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
01:19Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
01:24Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation