Cancer immunotherapy efficacy and patients' sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Fabio Conforti1, Laura Pala1, Vincenzo Bagnardi2
1Division of Medical Oncology for Melanoma & Sarcoma, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Background:
Despite the acknowledged sex-related dimorphism in immune system response, little is known about the effect of patients' sex on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors as cancer treatments. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the heterogeneity of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy between men and women.
Methods:
We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, from database inception to Nov 30, 2017, for randomised controlled trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (inhibitors of PD-1, CTLA-4, or both) that had available hazard ratios (HRs) for death according to patients' sex. We also reviewed abstracts and presentations from all major conference proceedings. We excluded non-randomised trials and considered only papers published in English. The primary endpoint was to assess the difference in efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors between men and women, measured in terms of the difference in overall survival log(HR) reported in male and female study participants. We calculated the pooled overall survival HR and 95% CI in men and women using a random-effects model, and assessed the heterogeneity between the two estimates using an interaction test.
Findings:
Of 7133 studies identified in our search, there were 20 eligible randomised controlled trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab, tremelimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab) that reported overall survival according to patients' sex. Overall, 11 351 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers (7646 [67%] men and 3705 [33%] women) were included in the analysis; the most common types of cancer were melanoma (3632 [32%]) and non-small-cell lung cancer (3482 [31%]). The pooled overall survival HR was 0·72 (95% CI 0·65-0·79) in male patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, compared with men treated in control groups. In women treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, the pooled overall survival HR compared with control groups was 0·86 (95% CI 0·79-0·93). The difference in efficacy between men and women treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors was significant (p=0·0019).
Interpretation:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve overall survival for patients with advanced cancers such as melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer, but the magnitude of benefit is sex-dependent. Future research should guarantee greater inclusion of women in trials and focus on improving the effectiveness of immunotherapies in women, perhaps exploring different immunotherapeutic approaches in men and women.
Funding:
None.
Insights
Immune checkpoint inhibitors show sex-dependent efficacy in cancer treatment. Men benefit more than women, highlighting the need for sex-specific research and tailored immunotherapies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Sex-related differences in immune responses are known, but their impact on cancer treatment efficacy remains unclear.
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a key cancer therapy, yet their effectiveness may vary between sexes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ICIs.
- To assess the heterogeneity of ICI efficacy based on patient sex.
Main Methods:
- Searched major databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus) for RCTs of PD-1, CTLA-4, or dual ICIs up to November 2017.
- Analyzed overall survival hazard ratios (HRs) by sex from eligible trials, including 11,351 patients with advanced cancers.
- Used random-effects models and interaction tests to determine pooled HRs and assess sex-based efficacy differences.
Main Results:
- Twenty RCTs involving 11,351 patients (67% male) with melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer were included.
- Pooled overall survival HR was 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.79) for men and 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.93) for women receiving ICIs.
- A significant difference in ICI efficacy between sexes was observed (p=0.0019).
Conclusions:
- ICI efficacy in improving overall survival for advanced cancers is sex-dependent.
- Greater inclusion of women in clinical trials is crucial.
- Future research should focus on sex-specific immunotherapeutic strategies to enhance treatment effectiveness in women.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Cancer Survival Analysis


