Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Integration by Parts: Indefinite Integrals01:26

Integration by Parts: Indefinite Integrals

215
Integration by parts is a fundamental technique in calculus for evaluating integrals involving the product of two functions. It is particularly useful when direct integration is not feasible. The method is based on the product rule for differentiation, which states that the derivative of a product equals the derivative of the first function times the second, plus the first function times the derivative of the second. By integrating this identity and rearranging terms, the integration by parts...
215
Integration by Parts: Definite Integrals01:23

Integration by Parts: Definite Integrals

91
Definite integrals involving the product of two functions over a fixed interval can be evaluated using integration by parts. This method rewrites the integral as the difference of a product evaluated at the endpoints and a remaining definite integral that is often simpler to compute.A representative example is the definite integral of the inverse tangent function. Since there is no direct integration formula for arctan ⁡x, the integrand is rewritten as a product of arctan⁡ x and the...
91
Definite Integral01:29

Definite Integral

81
Consider a real-valued function defined on a closed interval. One of the fundamental objectives in calculus is to determine the area under the graph of such a function. When an exact computation is not readily available, this area can be estimated by dividing the interval into a finite number of equal subintervals. Each subinterval corresponds to a rectangle whose width is the length of the subinterval and whose height is determined by the value of the function at a selected point within that...
81
Indefinite Integrals01:25

Indefinite Integrals

75
The water inflow rate into a storage tank is not constant but increases over time. Initially, the pump delivers water at a rate of 5 L/min. However, the inflow rate increases by 2 L/min for each additional minute due to rising pressure or system adjustments. This scenario can be described mathematically by a linear function:It is necessary to integrate the inflow rate function to measure the total volume of water added to the tank over time. The total water volume V(t) is obtained by performing...
75
Integration by Parts: Problem Solving01:29

Integration by Parts: Problem Solving

75
Smart speakers process voice commands by modeling audio inputs as piecewise functions and analyzing them through integration against trigonometric functions, such as cosine. This mathematical approach is fundamental in signal processing, where complex sound waves are decomposed into simpler frequency components.Consider a definite integral involving a piecewise function multiplied by a cosine function. Because the function is defined differently over separate intervals, the integral is split...
75
Approximate Integration01:24

Approximate Integration

58
In many practical and theoretical contexts, the exact value of a definite integral may be inaccessible. This limitation typically arises when the antiderivative of a function is either unknown or cannot be expressed in a closed mathematical form. Alternatively, it can occur when a function is defined not by a formula but by a finite set of empirical data points, such as those collected during experiments. In these cases, approximate integration techniques provide a valuable solution.One of the...
58

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative effects of aerobic exercise intensity strategies on cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and obese postmenopausal women.

Physical activity and nutrition·2026
Same author

Confocal laser endomicroscopy for upper gastrointestinal neoplasia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endoscopy international open·2026
Same author

Age-Related Microbial Differences in Newly Diagnosed Crohn's Disease Reveal the Distinct Enrichment of Oral-Associated Taxa in Pediatric Patients.

Gut and liver·2026
Same author

Unraveling the diagnostic and prognostic signatures of oral microbiota in head and neck cancer.

BMC biology·2026
Same author

Dysbiosis of oral and gut microbiomes characterized by elevated Lactococcus in a mouse model of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

NPJ biofilms and microbiomes·2026
Same author

Microbiome and metabolite biomarkers of CAR T-cell therapy outcomes in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Blood advances·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.8K

Bottom-up and top-down modulation of multisensory integration.

Ilsong Choi1, Jae-Yun Lee1, Seung-Hee Lee1

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Current Opinion in Neurobiology
|May 21, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Multisensory integration, how the brain combines senses, is dynamic and varies between individuals and states. Factors like bottom-up and top-down influences modulate this process, creating unique perceptions.

More Related Videos

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

13.2K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.8K
MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

13.2K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory processing
  • Multisensory integration

Background:

  • Real-world sensory perception relies on integrating inputs from multiple modalities.
  • Multisensory integration is a dynamic process, not uniform across individuals or behavioral states.
  • Understanding the factors modulating this integration is key to understanding perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize recent findings on factors influencing sensory processing and multisensory integration.
  • To explore how the mammalian brain reconstructs a multisensory world across different states.
  • To discuss cortical circuits involved in modulating multisensory processing.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent rodent studies on sensory processing and multisensory integration.
  • Analysis of bottom-up and top-down factors affecting sensory modulation.
  • Discussion of relevant cortical circuits.

Main Results:

  • Multisensory integration is influenced by both bottom-up and top-down factors.
  • Specific cortical circuits play a role in modulating multisensory processing.
  • The brain dynamically adjusts multisensory processing based on various factors.

Conclusions:

  • Multisensory information is not a fixed signal but is dynamically modulated.
  • This dynamic modulation leads to a unique and subjective perceptual experience.
  • Individual differences and behavioral states significantly impact multisensory integration.