Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

A High-Fidelity Porcine Model of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation Following Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: June 6, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support costs in children bridged to heart transplantation - analysis of a linked database
Justin Godown1, Andrew H Smith2, Cary Thurm3
1Pediatric Cardiology, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN.
Insights
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in children awaiting heart transplant (HT) significantly increases hospitalization costs. Discharging patients on ventricular assist device (VAD) support may reduce overall expenses.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Medical Economics
- Transplant Surgery
Background:
- Pediatric mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has advanced, improving survival for children awaiting heart transplant (HT).
- Contemporary cost analyses for pediatric MCS bridging to HT are lacking.
- This study evaluates the economic impact of current MCS strategies in pediatric HT recipients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the contemporary costs associated with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in children bridged to heart transplant (HT).
- To compare hospitalization costs and length of stay (LOS) across different support strategies (no MCS, VAD, ECMO).
Main Methods:
- Utilized a linked Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) dataset (2002-2016).
- Calculated and inflated hospital charges to 2016 dollars.
- Adjusted costs for patient-specific characteristics using generalized linear mixed-effects models.
- Compared costs and LOS across no MCS, Ventricular Assist Device (VAD), and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) groups.
Main Results:
- Included 2873 pediatric HT recipients: 78.9% no MCS, 16.4% VAD, 4.7% ECMO.
- Both VAD and ECMO significantly increased total hospitalization costs compared to no MCS ($755,345 and $808,771 vs. $457,086, P < .001).
- VAD costs were higher pre-HT, while ECMO costs were higher post-HT; overall costs and LOS were similar between VAD and ECMO.
- Outpatient VAD support at HT showed lower total costs than inpatient continuous flow devices ($552,222 vs. $663,071, P = .003).
Conclusions:
- MCS as a bridge to pediatric HT is associated with substantially higher total hospitalization costs.
- While VAD and ECMO costs are comparable, their cost burdens occur at different phases (pre- vs. post-HT).
- Discharging pediatric patients on VAD support while awaiting HT may be a cost-saving strategy.
Background:
Pediatric mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has evolved considerably over the past decade. Though marked improvements in waitlist survival have been realized, costs have not been reassessed. This project aimed to assess contemporary MCS costs in children bridged to heart transplant (HT).
Methods:
All pediatric HT recipients (2002-2016) were identified from a unique, linked PHIS/SRTR dataset. Costs were calculated from hospital charges, inflated to 2016 Dollars and adjusted for patient-specific characteristics using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Costs and length of stay (LOS) were compared across support strategies at the time of HT (no MCS, VAD, or ECMO) with select subgroup analyses.
Results:
A total of 2873 pediatric HT recipients were included; no MCS: 2268 (78.9%), VAD: 470 (16.4%), and ECMO: 135 (4.7%). Both VAD and ECMO were associated with greater total hospitalization costs compared to no MCS ($755,345 and $808,771 vs. $457,086; P < .001). Total costs and LOS were similar between VAD and ECMO groups; however, costs and LOS were greatest for VAD-supported patients in the pre-HT period and greatest for ECMO-supported patients post-HT. Post-HT costs and LOS were similar between patients who did not require MCS and those supported with a VAD ($324,887 and 18 days vs. $329,198 and 18 days respectively, p = NS). Outpatients with VAD support at HT demonstrated significantly lower total costs compared to those who were inpatient with continuous flow devices ($552,222 vs. $663,071, P = .003).
Conclusions:
MCS as a bridge to HT in children is associated with greater total costs. While costs are similar between VAD and ECMO groups, the majority of costs associated with VAD support is incurred pre-HT while ECMO costs are incurred primarily post-HT. Discharging patients on VAD support awaiting HT may represent a strategy to reduce costs in this population.
More Related Videos
08:15Innovative Strategies for Organ Preservation in Heart Transplantation: Uniform Cooling Preservation and Ex-situ Normothermic Perfusion
Published on: November 28, 2025
10:56Transplantation of Pulmonary Valve Using a Mouse Model of Heterotopic Heart Transplantation
Published on: July 23, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Anatomy of the Circulatory System
Transducer Mechanism: Enzyme-Linked Receptors
Major types that are helpful drug targets include:
Design Example: Strain Gauge Bridge or Wheatstone Bridge
Wheatstone Bridge
Thus, for accurate resistance measurements, a...
Bridge rectifier
Operationally, the bridge rectifier allows current flow through two of its diodes during each...
Cross-bridge Cycle