Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly
Published on: March 11, 2022
Foot Kinematics Differ Between Runners With and Without a History of Navicular Stress Fractures
James Becker1, Stanley James2, Louis Osternig3
1Department of Health and Human Development, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA.
Background:
A navicular stress fracture (NSF) is a common and high-risk injury in distance runners. It is not clear whether there are differences in foot structure and function between runners who have and those who have not sustained an NSF.
Purpose/Hypothesis:
This study compared foot structure, range of motion, and biomechanics between runners with a history of unilateral NSFs and runners who had never sustained this injury. The hypothesis was that runners with a history of NSFs will have less dorsiflexion and subtalar range of motion in a clinical examination and greater rearfoot eversion and higher eversion velocity while running than either the noninvolved feet or healthy controls.
Study Design:
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Seven runners who sustained an NSF were matched with 7 controls without this injury history. Participants underwent a clinical orthopaedic examination, followed by a 3-dimensional running gait analysis. Clinical examination variables, foot kinematics, and ground-reaction forces were compared between injured and noninjured feet within the NSF group and between the NSF group and control group.
Results:
The NSF group demonstrated less plantar flexion on the clinical examination than the control group (P = .034, effect size [ES] = 0.69). The involved feet of the NSF group demonstrated greater rearfoot eversion excursion, greater eversion velocity, and reduced forefoot abduction excursion than either the noninvolved feet of the NSF group (P = .015, ES = 1.73; P = .015, ES = 1.86; and P = .015, ES = 0.96, respectively) or the control group (P = .012, ES = 1.40; P = .016, ES = 0.49; and P = .005, ES = 1.60, respectively).
Conclusion:
There are differences in foot kinematics but not ground-reaction forces, foot structure, or passive range of motion between runners who have and those who have not sustained an NSF. Runners who demonstrate increased rearfoot eversion and reduced forefoot abduction during stance may be more at risk for developing NSFs.
Related Concept Videos
What is Evolutionary History?
Life Histories
Muscles of the Leg that Move the Foot and Toes
Anterior Compartment
The anterior compartment includes muscles that contribute to the dorsiflexion of the foot. This compartment houses the tibialis anterior, extensor hallucis longus, and extensor digitorum longus muscles....
History of Microbiology
Kinematic Equations - I
Kinematic Equations - II
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...

