Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass
Published on: July 14, 2023
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Compared to Volitional Exercise for Improving Muscle Function in Rheumatoid
Sara R Piva1, Samannaaz S Khoja1, Frederico G S Toledo1
1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and high-intensity resistance training both effectively improve muscle function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. NMES is a viable alternative, but higher attrition rates require consideration.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Exercise Physiology
- Muscle Biology
Background:
- Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commonly leads to muscle dysfunction, impacting physical function and quality of life.
- Effective interventions are needed to improve muscle structure and function in RA patients.
- Comparing neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with volitional resistance training offers insights into optimizing rehabilitation strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the feasibility and effectiveness of NMES versus high-intensity volitional resistance training in RA patients.
- To assess improvements in muscle structure, muscle function, and physical function.
- To evaluate changes in myocyte characteristics and feasibility metrics.
Main Methods:
- A 16-week, 2-group, single-blind, randomized pilot study involving adult RA patients.
- Interventions included 36 sessions of NMES (n=31) or volitional training (n=28).
- Outcome measures encompassed muscle (quadriceps area, density, strength), physical function, feasibility (pain, disease activity, attrition, adherence), and myocyte characteristics.
Main Results:
- Both NMES and volitional training significantly improved muscle structure and function (P < 0.001 to 0.019).
- No significant differences were observed between groups in muscle characteristics or physical function improvements.
- Exercise interventions did not lead to serious adverse events, increased pain, or disease activity. Attrition was higher in the NMES group (29%) compared to the volitional group (7%).
Conclusions:
- Both NMES and high-intensity volitional resistance training are effective for enhancing muscle structure and function in RA patients.
- NMES presents a viable alternative for patients who may not tolerate or are contraindicated for high-intensity resistance exercise.
- Attrition rates associated with NMES warrant careful consideration in clinical application.
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Functions of Smooth Muscles
Function of visceral smooth muscles
Visceral smooth muscle is found in the walls of all hollow organs, except the heart, and is a key player in the involuntary movements that drive the functioning of these internal organs. This tissue is arranged in...
Pilot and Numeric Relaying
Random Error

