Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Development of a Neonatal Piglet Acute Lung Injury Model Recreating the Early Environment of Preterm Infant Lungs
Published on: October 31, 2025
Biobehavioral Responses of Preterm Infants to Conventional and Swaddled Tub Baths: A Randomized Crossover Trial
Patrícia de Freitas1, Mariana Bueno, Diane Holditch-Davis
1School of Nursing, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Drs Freitas, Bueno, and Kimura); Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Holditch-Davis); and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing (Dr Santos).
Insights
Swaddled baths and conventional tub baths did not significantly differ in their effects on preterm infants
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care and developmental pediatrics.
- Infant physiology and stress response.
- Evidence-based nursing practices.
Background:
- Routine bathing of preterm infants can induce stress and alter biobehavioral responses due to prolonged handling.
- Understanding the impact of different bathing methods is crucial for optimizing neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) environments.
- Swaddled bathing is a potential alternative to conventional tub baths, aiming to minimize infant stress.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of swaddled baths versus conventional tub baths on preterm infants' physiological and behavioral responses.
- To assess differences in body temperature, heart rate (HR), peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2), salivary cortisol, and sleep-wake states.
- To evaluate the impact of bathing methods on stress markers and recovery in vulnerable preterm infants.
Main Methods:
- A double-blind randomized crossover trial involving 43 preterm infants (32-36 weeks postmenstrual age, weight ≤2225 g).
- Infants received both swaddled and conventional tub baths, with a 24-72 hour washout period between interventions.
- Physiological (temperature, HR, SpO2), hormonal (salivary cortisol), and behavioral (sleep-wake states) data were collected pre-bath and during recovery.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found in mean body temperature, HR, SpO2, or salivary cortisol levels between swaddled and conventional tub baths.
- Sleep-wake states also showed no significant variations between the two bathing methods during baseline or the first 20 minutes post-bath.
- Salivary cortisol levels exhibited a non-statistically significant increase irrespective of the bath type, suggesting a minimal stress response.
Conclusions:
- Both swaddled and conventional tub baths appear to be equally safe and well-tolerated regarding immediate physiological and hormonal stress markers in preterm infants.
- The findings suggest that current bathing practices, whether swaddled or conventional, do not elicit significant acute stress responses in this preterm infant population.
- Further research may explore longer-term developmental outcomes or subtle behavioral differences not captured in the immediate post-bath recovery period.
Abstract:
Bathing is a routine care procedure that exposes preterm infants to prolonged handling, which could cause stress and potentially disrupt infants' biobehavioral responses. The aim of this double-blind randomized crossover trial was to compare the preterm infant's body temperature, heart rate (HR), peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2), salivary cortisol levels, and sleep-wake states during and after swaddled and conventional tub baths. Forty-three infants born at 32 to 36 weeks postmenstrual age, weighing 2225 g or less, were enrolled in the study. Infants were videotaped before and after each type of baths. The time interval between baths ranged from 24 to 72 hours to allow a washout period. Physiological, hormonal, and behavioral responses were collected at baseline and during recovery from baths. No significant differences in the mean body temperature, HR, SpO2, salivary cortisol levels, and sleep-wake states between the bath types were observed in the baseline or recovery responses during the first 20 minutes after bath. Regardless of bath type, salivary cortisol levels showed a nonstatistical significant increase.
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Sign Convention
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Random Error

