Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

856
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
856
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

420
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
420
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

7.7K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Physiology of Smell and Olfactory Pathway01:20

Physiology of Smell and Olfactory Pathway

13.0K
Humans detect odors with the help of specialized cells located in the upper part of the nasal cavity, called olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs). ORNs possess hair-like structures called cilia, which are receptive to sensations from the inhaled air. When an odorant molecule binds to a specific receptor on the cell of the cilia, it leads to a series of events that ultimately cause the ORN to send electrical signals to the olfactory bulb in the brain through the olfactory nerves.
The olfactory...
13.0K
Olfactory Receptors: Location and Structure01:03

Olfactory Receptors: Location and Structure

11.9K
The process of olfaction, also known as the sense of smell, is a sophisticated chemical response system. The specialized sensory neurons that facilitate this process, known as olfactory receptor neurons, are situated in an upper segment of the nasal cavity, known as the olfactory epithelium. Olfactory sensory neurons are bipolar, with their dendrites extending from the epithelium's apex into the mucus that lines the nasal cavity. Airborne molecules, when inhaled, traverse the olfactory...
11.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Randomized trial comparing 5-year follow-up of first-line infliximab to conventional therapy in paediatric Crohn's disease.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association·2026
Same author

Comparison of techniques for the evaluation of taste sensitivity.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Olfactory bulb volume changes following olfactory training in normosmic individuals.

Rhinology·2026
Same author

Peppermint Oil and Sweets in Pediatric Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Abdominal Pain: A Randomized Trial.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association·2026
Same author

The APOLLO trial: a proof-of-concept study for vitamin A nasal drops in COVID-19-related postinfectious olfactory dysfunction.

Chemical senses·2026
Same author

Olfactory dysfunction in CHARGE syndrome: a systematic review of prevalence, assessment methods, and clinical correlates.

Rhinology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Controlled Odor Mimic Permeation Systems for Olfactory Training and Field Testing
05:54

Controlled Odor Mimic Permeation Systems for Olfactory Training and Field Testing

Published on: January 28, 2021

5.1K

The confounding effect of background odors on olfactory sensitivity testing.

A Oleszkiewicz1, L Rambacher2, K L Whitcroft3

  • 1Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Germany; University of Wroclaw, Institute of Psychology, Wroclaw, Poland.

Journal of Neuroscience Methods
|May 22, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Background odors significantly impair olfactory sensitivity testing. Congruent odors caused greater impairment than non-congruent odors, with the best odor threshold scores achieved in odor-free environments.

Keywords:
MethodsNeuroscience methodsOlfactionOlfactory sensitivityThreshold

More Related Videos

Olfactory Behavioral Testing in the Adult Mouse
09:00

Olfactory Behavioral Testing in the Adult Mouse

Published on: January 28, 2009

20.3K
Simple and Computer-assisted Olfactory Testing for Mice
06:40

Simple and Computer-assisted Olfactory Testing for Mice

Published on: June 15, 2015

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Controlled Odor Mimic Permeation Systems for Olfactory Training and Field Testing
05:54

Controlled Odor Mimic Permeation Systems for Olfactory Training and Field Testing

Published on: January 28, 2021

5.1K
Olfactory Behavioral Testing in the Adult Mouse
09:00

Olfactory Behavioral Testing in the Adult Mouse

Published on: January 28, 2009

20.3K
Simple and Computer-assisted Olfactory Testing for Mice
06:40

Simple and Computer-assisted Olfactory Testing for Mice

Published on: June 15, 2015

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Olfactory science
  • Sensory perception research

Background:

  • Human olfactory sensitivity exhibits significant inter-individual variability.
  • Environmental factors, including background odors, are known to influence odor threshold measurements.
  • The precise impact of congruent versus non-congruent background odors on olfactory sensitivity requires further elucidation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of congruent and non-congruent background odors on olfactory threshold scores.
  • To quantify the impairment of target odor threshold scores under different background odor conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Odor threshold testing was conducted on 103 normosmic adults.
  • Phenylethylalcohol (PEA) or linalool served as target odors.
  • Testing occurred under three conditions: congruent background odor, non-congruent background odor, and no background odor.

Main Results:

  • Congruent background odors significantly impaired target odor threshold scores.
  • Non-congruent background odors also impaired threshold scores, with a more pronounced effect observed when PEA was the target odor and linalool was the background odor.
  • Optimal odor threshold scores were achieved in the absence of any background odor.

Conclusions:

  • Background odors negatively impact olfactory threshold testing accuracy.
  • Congruent background odors present a particular challenge, significantly affecting results.
  • Recommendations emphasize conducting olfactory threshold tests in well-ventilated, odor-free environments to ensure reliable measurements.