Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.5K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.5K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

384
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
384

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification of 1-O-Galloyl -β-D-glucose as a potent activator of Sirtuin-1: an in-silico study.

Journal of molecular graphics & modelling·2025
Same author

Ethnic and region-specific genetic risk variants of stroke and its comorbid conditions can define the variations in the burden of stroke and its phenotypic traits.

eLife·2024
Same author

Interaction analysis of SARS-CoV-2 omicron BA1 and BA2 of RBD with fifty monoclonal antibodies: Molecular dynamics approach.

Journal of molecular graphics & modelling·2024
Same author

RFGR: Repeat Finder for Complete and Assembled Whole Genomes and NGS Reads.

Biochemical genetics·2024
Same author

Chrysin inhibits adipogenesis by modulating PPARγ: <i>in silico</i> and <i>in vitro</i> studies.

Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics·2023
Same author

Discovery of a new <i>Daboia russelli</i> viper venom PLA<sub>2</sub> inhibitor using virtual screening of pharmacophoric features of co-crystallized compound.

Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases
07:26

Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases

Published on: March 19, 2018

9.8K

RBLOSUM performs better than CorBLOSUM with lesser error per query.

Renganayaki Govindarajan1, Biji Christopher Leela2, Achuthsankar S Nair2

  • 1Department of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. rengabioinf@gmail.com.

BMC Research Notes
|May 23, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study re-evaluates protein sequence alignment matrices, finding that RBLOSUM matrices offer statistically superior performance compared to BLOSUM and CorBLOSUM. The research highlights the importance of accurate matrix selection for improved protein alignment accuracy.

Keywords:
BLOSUMCorBLOSUMRBLOSUMSequence similarity searchSubstitution matrix

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases
07:26

Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases

Published on: March 19, 2018

9.8K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • BLOSUM matrices are standard for protein sequence alignment.
  • Previous research suggested CorBLOSUM improves upon BLOSUM by addressing inaccuracies in clustering algorithms.
  • The latest BLOCKS database version (14.3) contains significantly more data than used for original BLOSUM construction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To verify computational findings regarding CorBLOSUM and BLOSUM matrices.
  • To compare the performance of RBLOSUM, CorBLOSUM, and BLOSUM matrices.
  • To assess the impact of updated BLOCKS database versions on matrix performance.

Main Methods:

  • Replicated computations of BLOSUM and RBLOSUM matrices using BLOCKS version 14.3.
  • Calculated relative entropy values for different matrix versions.
  • Performed comparative analyses using Astral datasets to evaluate alignment accuracy and coverage.

Main Results:

  • Observed relative entropy values for BLOSUM62 (14.3) as 0.2360 and BLOSUM50 (14.3) as 0.1198.
  • Determined that BLOSUM62 should be compared with RBLOSUM66 and BLOSUM50 with RBLOSUM56 due to similar entropy values.
  • Demonstrated statistically superior performance of RBLOSUM matrices over CorBLOSUM and BLOSUM in experiments with Astral datasets, showing improved accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • RBLOSUM matrices demonstrate statistically better performance than CorBLOSUM and BLOSUM.
  • Accurate comparison of matrices requires consideration of their relative entropy values.
  • Updated BLOCKS database versions and appropriate matrix selection enhance protein sequence alignment accuracy.