Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Isolation of Region-specific Microglia from One Adult Mouse Brain Hemisphere for Deep Single-cell RNA Sequencing
Published on: December 3, 2019
RNA sequencing analysis reveals quiescent microglia isolation methods from postnatal mouse brains and limitations of
Yingbo He1, Xiang Yao2, Natalie Taylor3
1Janssen Research & Development, LLC., Neuroscience Drug Discovery, 3210 Merryfield Row, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA. yhe50@its.jnj.com.
Background:
Microglia play key roles in neuron-glia interaction, neuroinflammation, neural repair, and neurotoxicity. Currently, various microglial in vitro models including primary microglia derived from distinct isolation methods and immortalized microglial cell lines are extensively used. However, the diversity of these existing models raises difficulty in parallel comparison across studies since microglia are sensitive to environmental changes, and thus, different models are likely to show widely varied responses to the same stimuli. To better understand the involvement of microglia in pathophysiological situations, it is critical to establish a reliable microglial model system.
Methods:
With postnatal mouse brains, we isolated microglia using three general methods including shaking, mild trypsinization, and CD11b magnetic-associated cell sorting (MACS) and applied RNA sequencing to compare transcriptomes of the isolated cells. Additionally, we generated a genome-wide dataset by RNA sequencing of immortalized BV2 microglial cell line to compare with primary microglia. Furthermore, based on the outcomes of transcriptional analysis, we compared cellular functions between primary microglia and BV2 cells including immune responses to LPS by quantitative RT-PCR and Luminex Multiplex Assay, TGFβ signaling probed by Western blot, and direct migration by chemotaxis assay.
Results:
We found that although the yield and purity of microglia were comparable among the three isolation methods, mild trypsinization drove microglia in a relatively active state, evidenced by high amount of amoeboid microglia, enhanced expression of microglial activation genes, and suppression of microglial quiescent genes. In contrast, CD11b MACS was the most reliable and consistent method, and microglia isolated by this method maintained a relatively resting state. Transcriptional and functional analyses revealed that as compared to primary microglia, BV2 cells remain most of the immune functions such as responses to LPS but showed limited TGFβ signaling and chemotaxis upon chemoattractant C5a.
Conclusions:
Collectively, we determined the optimal isolation methods for quiescent microglia and characterized the limitations of BV2 cells as an alternative of primary microglia. Considering transcriptional and functional differences, caution should be taken when extrapolating data from various microglial models. In addition, our RNA sequencing database serves as a valuable resource to provide novel insights for appropriate application of microglia as in vitro models.
Insights
Choosing the right microglial model is crucial. CD11b MACS isolation yields quiescent primary microglia, while BV2 cells have limitations in TGFβ signaling and migration compared to primary cells.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Immunology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Microglia are vital immune cells in the central nervous system, involved in neuroinflammation, repair, and neurotoxicity.
- Existing in vitro microglial models, including primary cultures and cell lines, exhibit significant variability, hindering direct comparisons.
- Establishing reliable microglial models is essential for understanding their role in disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare transcriptomes and functions of primary microglia isolated by different methods (shaking, trypsinization, CD11b MACS) and immortalized BV2 cells.
- To identify optimal isolation methods for quiescent primary microglia.
- To characterize the functional limitations of BV2 cells compared to primary microglia.
Main Methods:
- Primary microglia isolated from mouse brains using shaking, mild trypsinization, and CD11b MACS.
- RNA sequencing to compare transcriptomes of isolated primary microglia and BV2 cells.
- Functional assays including LPS response (RT-PCR, Luminex), TGFβ signaling (Western blot), and chemotaxis.
Main Results:
- Mild trypsinization resulted in activated microglia, while CD11b MACS yielded the most consistent, quiescent primary microglia.
- BV2 cells retained immune responses to LPS but showed diminished TGFβ signaling and chemotaxis compared to primary microglia.
- Transcriptional analysis revealed significant differences between primary microglia and BV2 cells.
Conclusions:
- CD11b MACS is recommended for isolating quiescent primary microglia.
- BV2 cells have functional limitations and should be used with caution as a primary microglia alternative.
- The study provides a valuable RNA sequencing database for informed selection and application of microglial models.
Related Concept Videos
Limiting Reactant
RNA Interference
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
Alternative RNA Splicing
There are five types of alternative RNA splicing that vary in the ways the pre-mRNA segments are removed or retained in the mature mRNA. The first...
RNA Splicing
The Number e as a Limit
Types of RNA
Three main types of RNA are involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). These RNAs perform diverse functions and can be broadly classified as protein-coding or non-coding RNA. Non-coding RNAs play important roles in the regulation of gene expression in response to developmental and environmental changes. Non-coding RNAs in prokaryotes can be manipulated to develop more effective antibacterial drugs for human or animal use.
RNA...

