Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Systematic evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for pharmacogenomics
Robert D Beckett1, David F Kisor2, Thomas Smith3
1Manchester University Doctor of Pharmacy Program, Department of Pharmacy Practice, 10627 Diebold Rd, Fort Wayne, IN 46845, USA.
The methodological quality of pharmacogenomics clinical practice guidelines was assessed using the AGREE II instrument. While generally high, the quality scores showed variability across different domains.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacogenomics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Methodological Quality Assessment
Background:
- Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is crucial for personalized medicine.
- Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) guide the integration of PGx into healthcare.
- Systematic assessment of PGx CPG quality is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the methodological quality of pharmacogenomics clinical practice guidelines.
- To identify strengths and weaknesses in existing PGx guidelines.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of PGx guidelines published up to 2017.
- Utilized the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.
- Involved assessment by at least three independent reviewers using a 7-point rating scale.
Main Results:
- 31 PGx guidelines were included in the analysis.
- Mean AGREE II domain scores varied, with 'applicability' scoring lowest (46.6%) and 'clarity of presentation' highest (78.9%).
- The median overall quality score was 72.2%.
Conclusions:
- Pharmacogenomics guidelines demonstrate generally high methodological quality.
- Variability in quality across AGREE II domains suggests areas for improvement.
- Ensuring consistent quality is essential for effective implementation of pharmacogenomics.
Related Concept Videos
Random and Systematic Errors
Guidelines for Sketching a Curve
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Legal Guidelines for Documentation

