Improving Translation from Preclinical Studies to Clinical Trials in Acute Kidney Injury

Several cellular and molecular targets and mechanisms have been investigated in preclinical studies of acute kidney injury (AKI), but translation in successful clinical studies has failed to date. This article reviews many issues that have limited this and the potential future perspectives in AKI prevention and treatment.

Preclinical models of AKI should closely mimic the complexity of human AKI, considering the importance of several comorbidities in determining the clinical course and outcomes in the human disease. Moreover, studies should test novel interventions in models where AKI is already established, instead of focusing only at primary prevention. AKI definitions and endpoints in animal studies should be similar to those applied in clinical studies; in particular, AKI biomarkers should be implemented to guide patient selection for clinical trials and monitor intervention efficacy. In this scenario, cell-cycle arrest biomarkers have been widely investigated as AKI predictors in both preclinical and clinical studies and they serve as useful tools for future interventional studies. A better understanding of human AKI through a large collection of biological samples and kidney biopsies and omics applications, and an iterative relationship between preclinical and clinical studies are critical steps to improve future preclinical models and clinical trials. Finally, given the great variability in clinical manifestation of AKI, a strong collaboration between research centers and industry is recommended. Key messages: Several methodological issues have hampered the translation of basic research findings in clinical studies, and overcoming these obstacles is necessary to achieve success.