Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Loading Drosophila Nerve Terminals with Calcium Indicators
Published on: July 30, 2007
Discrepancies Between Nomenclature and Indications of Psychotropics
Fusaka Minami1, Joseph Zohar2, Takefumi Suzuki3
1Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Introduction:
While the current nomenclature of psychotropic drugs is disease-based, their approved indications do not always match their classifications.
Methods:
Information on approved indications of "second-generation antipsychotics" and "newer antidepressants" that are available in the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), France, Germany, and Japan were extracted from their packet inserts.
Results:
A significant proportion of "atypical antipsychotics" were approved for psychiatric conditions other than psychotic disorders (i. e., bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and autistic disorder) as follows: 76.9% in the US, 66.7% in the UK, 66.7% in France, 60.0% in Germany, and 44.4% in Japan. Likewise, more than half of "newer antidepressants" had approved indications for psychiatric conditions other than depression (e. g., panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, social anxiety disorder, general anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder): 56.3% in the US, 69.2% in the UK, 69.2% in France, 50.0% in Germany, and 62.5% in Japan.
Conclusions:
Our results raise concerns regarding generic terminologies of "antipsychotics" and "antidepressants" since the conventional indication-based nomenclature does not fit well with the official indication.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Indicators
Molecular Compounds: Formulas and Nomenclature
Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature
Ionic Compounds: Formulas and Nomenclature
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects

