Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Systematic Assessment of Well-Being in Mice for Procedures Using General Anesthesia
Published on: March 20, 2018
Exploring how non-inferiority and equivalence are assessed in paediatrics: a systematic review
Camille Aupiais1, Sarah Zohar2, Garry Taverny3
1Inserm UMR 1123-ECEVE, UMRS 1138, Team 22, CRC; APHP, Hôpital Robert Debré, University Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
Insights
Quality of non-inferiority and equivalence trials in paediatrics needs improvement. Methodological reporting and interpretation issues, particularly concerning margins and conclusions, are prevalent in pediatric research.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Paediatric Research
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Non-inferiority and equivalence trials are crucial in paediatric research to demonstrate therapeutic non-inferiority or equivalence.
- Evaluating the quality of these trials is essential for reliable clinical decision-making in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the characteristics, methodology, and reporting standards of non-inferiority and equivalence trials specifically within the paediatric context.
- To identify areas for improvement in the design, execution, and reporting of these critical trial types in children.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane databases up to September 2016.
- Inclusion criteria: non-inferiority/equivalence randomized controlled trials in children, published in high-impact journals.
- Analysis of trial characteristics, statistical methods, margin reporting, and author conclusions.
Main Results:
- 125 trials were included; 10% had inconsistent statistical hypotheses.
- Trials often evaluated interventions with easier administration or better safety profiles.
- Margins were reported in 95% of trials, but justification methods were only reported in 37%; margins were wider in smaller trials.
- Disagreement with author conclusions occurred in 11% of reports.
Conclusions:
- Significant improvements are needed in the methodology, reporting, and interpretation of paediatric non-inferiority and equivalence trials.
- Unjustified margins and conclusions unsupported by data are common issues.
- Development and application of appropriate methods are necessary to address challenges like small sample sizes in this vulnerable population.
Objective:
To review characteristics, methodology and reporting of non-inferiority and equivalence trials in the specific context of paediatrics.
Design:
PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched (up to September 2016) for non-inferiority/equivalence randomised controlled trials conducted in children published in high-impact-factor journals (>5.0 for general/specialist medical journals; >2.2 for paediatric journals).
Results:
We found that the statistical hypothesis was inconsistent with the objective in 12 (10%) of the 125 reports included. Non-inferiority (n=98) and equivalence trials (n=27) were mostly used to evaluate interventions with easier administration (45%, n=54/120) and/or better safety profile (34%, n=41/120). All the data needed for targeted sample size recalculation were available for 39 reports (31%). The margin-representing the largest difference between arms that would be clinically acceptable-was reported in 119 (95%), and 44/119 (37%) reported the method used for margin determination. The median sample size was 268 (IQR 125-531). Margins were wider in smaller trials (<125 randomised patients) than in larger trials (p=0.04/p<0.01 for binary/continuous outcomes, respectively). We did not agree with the authors' conclusions in 11% (11/103) of the reports that provided sufficient information.
Conclusions:
There is still a need to improve the quality of methodology, reporting and interpretation of non-inferiority/equivalence trials in paediatrics. In particular, the margins were often not justified and the conclusion was often not supported by the design and/or the results. As researchers have to cope with small sample size and with lack of evidence, methods for non-inferiority/equivalence trials need to be used and/or developed in this vulnerable population.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Pharmaceutical Equivalents
Equivalent Capacitance
The following strategies are adopted to calculate...
Equivalent Capacitance
Thévenin Equivalent Circuits

