Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Implantation of Human-Sized Coronary Stents into Rat Abdominal Aorta Using a Trans-Femoral Access
Published on: November 19, 2020
Survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: Why the hype about stent type? Lessons from a healthcare
Bhanu Duggal1, Jyothi Subramanian2, Mona Duggal3
1Department of Cardiology, AIIMS, Rishikesh, India.
Insights
Predictors of long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) include stent length and number. Drug-eluting stents (DESs) showed better outcomes than bare-metal stents (BMSs), especially after price caps were introduced.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common treatment for coronary artery disease.
- Government-funded insurance programs impact patient access to PCI and stent types.
- Predictors of long-term outcomes after PCI require further investigation, especially in diverse populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify predictors of long-term outcomes following PCI in a large, multicenter cohort.
- To compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus bare-metal stents (BMSs) in a real-world setting.
- To analyze the impact of stent characteristics and patient factors on survival and revascularization rates.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter observational study involving 4595 patients undergoing PCI.
- Utilized multivariable regression, propensity-matching, and machine learning methods.
- Compared outcomes between DES and BMS groups, analyzing mortality, re-hospitalization, and target lesion revascularization.
Main Results:
- Total stent length and number of stents deployed were key predictors of 1-year survival, surpassing age.
- Drug-eluting stents (DESs) demonstrated lower re-hospitalization rates compared to bare-metal stents (BMSs).
- Increased DES use post-price cap correlated with improved adjusted hazard ratios, suggesting price sensitivity.
Conclusions:
- Stent length and number are critical determinants of PCI success, supporting ischemia-guided revascularization.
- DESs offer superior outcomes to BMSs, particularly when cost barriers are reduced.
- Patient factors like age and employment status influence outcomes, highlighting the need for tailored care and rehabilitation programs.
Abstract:
A prospective, multicenter study was initiated by the Government of Maharashtra, India, to determine predictors of long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease, and to compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DESs) and bare-metal stents (BMSs) in patients undergoing PCI under government-funded insurance. The present analysis included 4595 patients managed between August 2012 and November 2016 at any of 110 participating centers. Using the classical multivariable regression and propensity-matching approach, we found age to be the most important predictor of 1-year mortality and target lesion revascularization at 1 year post-PCI. However, using machine learning methods to account for unmeasured confounders and bias in this large observational study, we determined total stent length and number of stents deployed as the most important predictors of 1-year survival, followed by age and employment status. The unadjusted death rates were 5.0% and 3.8% for the BMS and DES groups, respectively (p = 0.185, log-rank test). The rate of re-hospitalization (p<0.001) and recurrence of unstable angina (p = 0.08) was significantly lower for DESs than for BMSs. Increased use of DES after 2015 (following establishment of a price cap on DESs) was associated with a sharp decrease in adjusted hazard ratios of DESs versus BMSs (from 0.94 in 2013 to 0.58 in 2016), suggesting that high price was limiting DES use in some high-risk patients. Since stented length and stent number were the most important predictors of survival outcomes, adopting an ischemia-guided revascularization strategy is expected to help improve outcomes and reduce procedural costs. In the elderly, PCI should be reserved for cases where the benefits outweigh the higher risk of the procedure. As unemployed patients had poorer long-term outcomes, we expect that implementation of a post-PCI cardiovascular rehabilitation program may improve long-term outcomes.
More Related Videos
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Agencies II
Parish nursing is a growing specialty nursing profession that focuses on holistic healthcare, health promotion, and illness prevention. It blends professional nursing practice with a health ministry, focusing on health and healing within the context of a Christian community. Parish nurses serve as health educators, referral sources,...
Secondary Healthcare System
Tertiary Healthcare System
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
Healthcare Agencies I
Integrated Healthcare System