Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.4K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.4K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

383
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
383

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detecting Transition Points in the Slope-Intercept Relation in Linear Latent Growth Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2025
Same author

Mediators that Matter: Psychological Distress, Developmental Assets, and Educational Outcomes among Black Youth.

Journal of educational psychology·2025
Same author

Sedimentation in Saudi Arabia's 574 reservoirs: Nationwide assessment using remote sensing and erosion modeling.

Journal of environmental management·2025
Same author

nmax and the quest to restore caution, integrity, and practicality to the sample size planning process.

Psychological methods·2025
Same author

Multiphase Structured Latent Curve Models for Count Response Data: A Re-Analysis of the Acquisition of Morphology in English.

Psychometrika·2025
Same author

Predicting Post-Fracture Recovery with Smartphone Mobility Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions
13:43

Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions

Published on: June 24, 2013

14.6K

A Note on the Specification of Error Structures in Latent Interaction Models.

Xiulin Mao1, Jeffrey R Harring1, Gregory R Hancock1

  • 1University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Educational and Psychological Measurement
|May 26, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study investigates the impact of errors in latent interaction models. Misspecifying error structures can affect estimation results, offering guidance for researchers using product-indicator methods.

Keywords:
error structureslatent interaction modelsmodel misspecificationunconstrained method

More Related Videos

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
14:14

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Published on: August 12, 2018

9.4K
Culture Methods to Study Apical-Specific Interactions using Intestinal Organoid Models
07:49

Culture Methods to Study Apical-Specific Interactions using Intestinal Organoid Models

Published on: March 23, 2021

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions
13:43

Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions

Published on: June 24, 2013

14.6K
Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
14:14

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Published on: August 12, 2018

9.4K
Culture Methods to Study Apical-Specific Interactions using Intestinal Organoid Models
07:49

Culture Methods to Study Apical-Specific Interactions using Intestinal Organoid Models

Published on: March 23, 2021

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychometrics
  • Social Sciences

Background:

  • Latent interaction models are widely used in social sciences and psychology.
  • Product-indicator methods are popular for estimating these models due to ease of use.
  • Previous research focused on mean structure misspecification, neglecting error structure impacts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the consequences of misspecifying error structures in latent interaction models.
  • To analyze the effects of such misspecification on the unconstrained product-indicator approach.
  • To provide practical recommendations for researchers and practitioners.

Main Methods:

  • Algebraic demonstration of the ramifications of error structure misspecification.
  • Analysis focused on the unconstrained product-indicator approach within structural equation modeling.
  • Theoretical investigation without empirical data simulation or analysis.

Main Results:

  • Misspecification of error structures has significant algebraic consequences for parameter estimation.
  • The unconstrained product-indicator approach is particularly sensitive to these misspecifications.
  • The study highlights potential biases and inaccuracies in model results.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers must carefully consider and correctly specify the error structures in latent interaction models.
  • Ignoring error structure implications can lead to misleading findings when using product-indicator methods.
  • Recommendations are provided to enhance the accuracy and validity of latent interaction model applications.