Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Design and Development of a Model to Study the Effect of Supplemental Oxygen on the Cystic Fibrosis Airway Microbiome
Published on: August 3, 2021
Distress during airway sampling in children with cystic fibrosis
Jun Ting Chau1, Karen Peebles1, Yvonne Belessis2,3
1Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Insights
Oropharyngeal swab is a less distressing method for collecting airway samples in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) compared to suctioning. The Groningen Distress Rating Scale (GDRS) proved reliable for assessing patient distress.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Clinical Trial Methodology
Background:
- Cystic Fibrosis (CF) requires regular airway sample collection for diagnosis and management.
- Oropharyngeal suction and oropharyngeal swab are established methods for obtaining these samples.
- Previous research indicates similar diagnostic accuracy between these two methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the level of distress experienced by children with CF during oropharyngeal suction versus oropharyngeal swab.
- To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Groningen Distress Rating Scale (GDRS) in this pediatric population.
Main Methods:
- A randomized crossover design was employed, with children undergoing both oropharyngeal suction and swab over two separate visits.
- Distress was assessed using the Groningen Distress Rating Scale (GDRS) by two physiotherapists and a parent.
- Heart rate (HR) was monitored as a physiological indicator of distress.
Main Results:
- Twenty-four children with CF (mean age 3 years) participated in the study.
- Both physiotherapist and parent ratings indicated significantly higher distress levels during oropharyngeal suction compared to oropharyngeal swab.
- The GDRS demonstrated very good inter-rater reliability between physiotherapists and good reliability between physiotherapists and parents.
Conclusions:
- Oropharyngeal swab is a less distressing method for obtaining airway samples in children with cystic fibrosis compared to oropharyngeal suction.
- The Groningen Distress Rating Scale (GDRS) is a reliable and valid tool for measuring distress in this context.
Background:
Oropharyngeal suction and oropharyngeal swab are two methods of obtaining airway samples with similar diagnostic accuracy in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). The primary aim was comparing distress between suctioning and swabbing. A secondary aim was establishing the reliability of the Groningen Distress Rating Scale (GDRS).
Methods:
Randomised oropharyngeal suction or swab occurred over two visits. Two physiotherapists and the child's parent rated distress using the GDRS. Heart rate (HR) was also measured.
Results:
24 children with CF, mean age of 3 years, participated. Both physiotherapist and parent rating showed significantly higher distress levels during suction than swab. Inter-rater reliability for the GDRS was very good between physiotherapists, and good between physiotherapist and parents.
Conclusion:
The study found that oropharyngeal swab is less distressing in obtaining samples than oropharyngeal suction and that the GDRS was reliable and valid.
Related Concept Videos
Cystic Fibrosis: Pathogenesis
CF is primarily caused by a genetic mutation in a chromosome 7 gene coding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The most common gene mutation leading to CF is the ΔF508 mutation,...
Cystic Fibrosis: Management
Sinus disease and chronic...
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Suctioning the Oropharyngeal Airway
After assembling the equipment, the nurse should practice hand hygiene and don appropriate PPE according to infection control guidelines to avoid the...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management

