Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Murine Oropharyngeal Aspiration Model of Ventilator-associated and Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
Published on: June 28, 2018
Comparative efficacy and safety analysis of CSE-1034: An open labeled phase III study in community acquired pneumonia
Manu Chaudhary1, Shiekh G Ayub1, Mohd A Mir1
1Department of Clinical Research, Venus Remedies, Panchkula, 134114, India.
Objective:
CSE-1034 is a novel antibiotic adjuvant entity (AAE) with proven activity against broad range of multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens causing various bacterial infections. This phase 3 clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CSE-1034 therapy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients of Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk III-IV.
Methods:
In this multi-centric, controlled, open-labeled phase 3 trial, adult patients with PORT risk III-IV CAP were randomized to receive either intravenous CSE-1034 (3g every 12h) or Ceftriaxone (2g every 12h) for 3-10 days. The primary endpoint was clinical response in clinically-evaluable (CE) population and microbiological eradication in microbiologically-evaluable (ME) population at test of cure (TOC) visits. Secondary endpoints included verification of the primary endpoints across all other visits, treatment duration and safety of patients.
Results:
156 patients were screened at 5 study centers of which 93 subjects were enrolled in the study and randomized in CSE-1034 and Ceftriaxone treatment arms. In CE population (n=90), the clinical cure rates at TOC visit were 96% and 64% in CSE-1034 (n=46) and Ceftriaxone (n=44) treatment arms respectively (treatment difference: 32.0%; 95% CI, 15.8%-47.1%). The bacterial eradication in ME population of two treatment arms were 94% (n=36) and 56% (n=27) at TOC visit (treatment difference: 38.9%; 95% CI, 17.8%-57.6%). Overall, the total number of adverse events (AEs) reported in both groups were 21 (22.5%). The AEs rates reported in two treatment arms were 15.2% in CSE-1034 and 29.8% in Ceftriaxone group.
Conclusion:
Overall assessment of clinical cure rate, microbiological eradication rate and safety assessment in this study has shown that CSE-1034 is an effective and safe option for the treatment of CAP patients of PORT risk III-IV. Moreover, the superiority of CSE-1034 over Ceftriaxone is also proven.
More Related Videos
09:17A Robust Pneumonia Model in Immunocompetent Rodents to Evaluate Antibacterial Efficacy against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii
Published on: January 2, 2017
08:26Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
Published on: July 17, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
What are Populations and Communities?
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Survey Safety
Pneumonia I: Introduction
Risk Factors
Various factors influence the likelihood of developing pneumonia. Age plays a crucial role, with infants, children under two, and individuals over 65 at increased risk due to their...
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology