Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization as a Tool for HPV-Related Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis
Published on: June 14, 2019
Role of chromogenic assays in haemophilia A and B diagnosis
A E Bowyer1, E M Duncan2, J P Antovic3
1Coagulation, Sheffield Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Sheffield, UK.
The laboratory diagnosis and monitoring of factors VIII and IX have been primarily by one-stage clotting assay (OSA) for many years. Chromogenic assays (CSA) have been available only in specialist laboratories and not for routine use. Significant differences, of more than 1.5-fold in results between the 2 assay methods, have been described in Europe and Australia in approximately one-third of patients with mild haemophilia A. In certain discrepant groups with restricted F8 gene mutations, the OSA results are more than 1.5-fold higher than CSA and risk a missed or misleading diagnostic result. More recently, an assay discrepancy in haemophilia B has been reported. With the introduction of extended half-life (EHL) FVIII and FIX products, it is likely most coagulation laboratories will need to evaluate at least one CSA and gain experience with this technique. The validation of CSA involves a careful appraisal of calibration curve linearity, limit of detection, precision, reference range, quality control material, sample analysis, method comparison and cost. This review will discuss the current status of FVIII and FIX CSA for the diagnosis of haemophilia A and B and describe approaches to implement CSA into the laboratory repertoire.
The laboratory diagnosis and monitoring of factors VIII and IX have been primarily by one-stage clotting assay (OSA) for many years. Chromogenic assays (CSA) have been available only in specialist laboratories and not for routine use. Significant differences, of more than 1.5-fold in results between the 2 assay methods, have been described in Europe and Australia in approximately one-third of patients with mild haemophilia A. In certain discrepant groups with restricted F8 gene mutations, the OSA results are more than 1.5-fold higher than CSA and risk a missed or misleading diagnostic result. More recently, an assay discrepancy in haemophilia B has been reported. With the introduction of extended half-life (EHL) FVIII and FIX products, it is likely most coagulation laboratories will need to evaluate at least one CSA and gain experience with this technique. The validation of CSA involves a careful appraisal of calibration curve linearity, limit of detection, precision, reference range, quality control material, sample analysis, method comparison and cost. This review will discuss the current status of FVIII and FIX CSA for the diagnosis of haemophilia A and B and describe approaches to implement CSA into the laboratory repertoire.
Related Concept Videos
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis
The nursing process considers the patient's emotional and physical well-being. The process can be repeated or stopped at any point if judged essential. Assessment is the first step in the nursing...
Nursing Diagnosis
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Role of Septins
Cellular Functions of Septins
Recent studies have revealed the multifaceted roles of septins in various cellular processes such as cytokinesis, ciliogenesis, and neurogenesis. Septins act as scaffolds and...
The Role of Culture

