Preinterventional hydrocortisone sustains the endothelial glycocalyx in cardiac surgery

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery commonly develop systemic inflammation associated with tissue edema, which impairs outcome. One main pathomechanism leading to the edema is the deterioration of the endothelial glycocalyx, a key component of the vascular barrier. In animal models hydrocortisone has proved to be protective for the glycocalyx.

This trial evaluates the effect of hydrocortisone on glycocalyx integrity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

In a prospective, randomized interventional pilot trial, 30 patients received either hydrocortisone (100 mg over 10 min) or placebo (saline control) before surgery. Plasma concentrations of glycocalyx constituents (syndecan-1, heparan sulfate) and various clinical parameters (respiratory and renal function, inflammatory markers, use of vasopressors, length of stay at the intensive care unit) were measured. Primary endpoint was a significant difference of glycocalyx constituents in plasma. Comparisons were made with Friedman's and Wilcoxon tests (paired data), or the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (unpaired data). Holm-Bonferroni method was used for post-hoc corrections.

Heparan sulfate and syndecan-1 increased significantly during and after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in both groups. Whereas the maximum increase of heparan sulfate was 12.3-fold in the control vs. 3.8-fold in the pretreated group (p < 0.05), syndecan-1 values showed no significant difference between the groups (maximal increase 3-fold). The inflammatory markers C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 were also higher in the control than in the hydrocortisone group, but there was no difference in patient mortality (zero), or in any clinical parameters.

Pretreatment with hydrocortisone ameliorated shedding of heparan sulfate, a major constituent of the endothelial glycocalyx, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, but had no relevant influence on various clinical parameters or patient mortality. The relatively small number of patients in this pilot study probably precluded detection of positive outcome differences.