Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Stage-Specific Survivability Prediction Models across Different Cancer Types
Elham Sagheb Hossein Pour1, Rohit J Kate2
1Biomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.
Abstract:
For all cancer types, survivability rates vary widely across different stages of cancer. But survivability prediction models built in past were trained using examples of all stages together and were also evaluated on all stages together. In this work, for ten cancer types and using three machine learning methods, we built survivability prediction models trained on each stage separately and compared their performance with the traditional models trained on all stages together. For both kinds of models, the evaluation was done on each stage separately as well as on all stages together. Our results show that for most cancer types the stages are sufficiently different from each other that it is best to build survivability prediction models separately for each stage. We also found that evaluating survivability prediction models on all stages together, as was done previously, overestimates performance for all the stages on all cancer types.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

