Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

3D Printing - Evaluating Particle Emissions of a 3D Printing Pen
Published on: October 9, 2020
Development of a Simple Mechanical Screening Method for Predicting the Feedability of a Pharmaceutical FDM 3D
Jehad M Nasereddin1, Nikolaus Wellner2, Muqdad Alhijjaj1,3
1School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Purpose:
The filament-based feeding mechanism employed by the majority of fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printers dictates that the materials must have very specific mechanical characteristics. Without a suitable mechanical profile, the filament can cause blockages in the printer. The purpose of this study was to develop a method to screen the mechanical properties of pharmaceutically-relevant, hot-melt extruded filaments to predetermine their suitability for FDM.
Methods:
A texture analyzer was used to simulate the forces a filament is subjected to inside the printer. The texture analyzer produced a force-distance curve referred to as the flexibility profile. Principal Component Analysis and Correlation Analysis statistical methods were then used to compare the flexibility profiles of commercial filaments to in-house made filaments.
Results:
Principal component analysis showed clearly separated clustering of filaments that suffer from mechanical defects versus filaments which are suitable for printing. Correlation scores likewise showed significantly greater values with feedable filaments than their mechanically deficient counterparts.
Conclusion:
The screening method developed in this study showed, with statistical significance and reproducibility, the ability to predetermine the feedability of extruded filaments into an FDM printer.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Equivalents
Mechanical Protein Functions
Development of Analytical Methods
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Reaction Mechanisms
For instance, the decomposition of ozone appears to follow a mechanism with two steps:
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

