Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Evaluating Plasmonic Transport in Current-carrying Silver Nanowires
09:00

Evaluating Plasmonic Transport in Current-carrying Silver Nanowires

Published on: December 11, 2013

5.6K

Spin-Hall effect in the scattering of structured light from plasmonic nanowire

Deepak K Sharma, Vijay Kumar, Adarsh B Vasista

    Optics Letters
    |June 2, 2018
    PubMed

    More Related Videos

    Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle15:06

    Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle

    Published on: January 3, 2016

    13.4K
    Polycrystalline Silicon Thin-film Solar cells with Plasmonic-enhanced Light-trapping09:32

    Polycrystalline Silicon Thin-film Solar cells with Plasmonic-enhanced Light-trapping

    Published on: July 2, 2012

    19.3K

    Related Concept Videos

    The Hall Effect01:30

    The Hall Effect

    Edwin H. Hall, in the year 1879, devised an experiment that could be used to identify the polarity of the predominant charge carriers in a conducting material. From a historical perspective, this experiment was the first to demonstrate that the charge carriers in most metals are negative.
    4.4K
    NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

    NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

    The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
    3.3K
    Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

    Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

    Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
    1.5K
    Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

    Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

    In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
    Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
    1.5K
    Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

    Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

    Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
    The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
    1.7K
    Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

    Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

    Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
    The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
    1.5K