Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Feasibility of Ballistic Strength Training in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized, Controlled, Assessor-Blinded Pilot Study
Genevieve Hendrey1, Ross A Clark2, Anne E Holland3
1Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Discipline of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Acquired Brain Injury Unit, Caulfield Hospital, Caufield, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Objective:
To establish the feasibility and effectiveness of a 6-week ballistic strength training protocol in people with stroke.
Design:
Randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded study.
Setting:
Subacute inpatient rehabilitation.
Participants:
Consecutively admitted inpatients with a primary diagnosis of first-ever stroke with lower limb weakness, functional ambulation category score of ≥3, and ability to walk ≥14 m were screened for eligibility to recruit 30 participants for randomization.
Interventions:
Participants were randomized to standard therapy or ballistic strength training 3 times per week for 6 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary aim was to evaluate feasibility and outcomes included recruitment rate, participant retention and attrition, feasibility of the exercise protocol, therapist burden, and participant safety. Secondary outcomes included measures of mobility, lower limb muscle strength, muscle power, and quality of life.
Results:
A total of 30 participants (11% of those screened) with mean age of 50 years (SD 18) were randomized. The median number of sessions attended was 15 of 18 and 17 of 18 for the ballistic and control groups, respectively. Earlier than expected discharge to home (n=4) and illness (n=7) were the most common reasons for nonattendance. Participants performed the exercises safely, with no study-related adverse events. There were significant (P<.05) between-group changes favoring the ballistic group for comfortable gait velocity (mean difference [MD] 0.31m/s, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08-0.52), muscle power, as measured by peak jump height (MD 8cm, 95% CI: 3-13), and peak propulsive velocity (MD 64cm/s, 95% CI: 17-112).
Conclusions:
Ballistic training was safe and feasible in select ambulant people with stroke. Similar rates of retention and attrition suggest that ballistic training was acceptable to patients. Secondary outcomes provide promising results that warrant further investigation in a larger trial.
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Blinding
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Pilot and Numeric Relaying
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

