Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Spinal Surgery
Published on: August 17, 2022
Venous thromboembolic complications with and without intermittent intraoperative and postoperative pneumatic
M Ebeling1, W Lüdemann2, J Frisius3
1Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hanover, Germany.
Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) did not significantly reduce deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients undergoing surgery. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to confirm potential benefits of IPC in this high-risk population.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Oncology
Background:
- Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients undergoing intracranial surgery face a high risk of thromboembolic complications.
- Standard thromboprophylaxis includes compression stockings, low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and physiotherapy.
- The role of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) as an adjunct in this patient population requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative and postoperative intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) in reducing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) incidence.
- To compare IPC with standard thromboprophylaxis methods in patients undergoing glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) surgery.
- To assess the impact of IPC on pulmonary embolism (PE) rates post-neurosurgery.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 153 patients who underwent intracranial surgery for GBM with intraoperative MRI guidance.
- Patients were divided into two groups: 75 with additional IPC and 78 without IPC.
- Both groups received standard thromboprophylaxis; DVT and PE were screened postoperatively via Doppler ultrasonography and CT scans.
Main Results:
- Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) occurred in 8% of patients with IPC versus 3.9% without IPC (P=0.33), a non-significant increase.
- Pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence showed a non-significant reduction from 2.6% to 1.3% with IPC (P=0.59).
- The study found no statistically significant difference in thromboembolic complications between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Intraoperative and postoperative IPC did not significantly decrease DVT or PE incidence in GBM patients compared to standard prophylaxis.
- The low complication rates suggest that surgical intervention, immobilization, and existing thromboprophylaxis may be more influential than anticipated.
- Larger patient cohorts are necessary to detect statistically significant effects of IPC or to explore alternative mechanisms for coagulopathy in GBM patients.
More Related Videos
10:52Stereotactic Intracranial Implantation and In vivo Bioluminescent Imaging of Tumor Xenografts in a Mouse Model System of Glioblastoma Multiforme
Published on: September 25, 2012
05:37Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Atomic Nuclei: Magnetic Resonance
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR): Overview
NMR spectroscopy generates a spectrum where the characteristic absorption frequencies of the sample are...
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Resonance