Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Automatic Separation and Collection of Cancer-Related Substances from Clinical Samples
Published on: January 13, 2023
State Prevalence and Ranks of Adolescent Substance Use: Implications for Cancer Prevention
Jennifer L Moss1, Benmei Liu2, Li Zhu2
1Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Room 4E514, MSC 9765, Bethesda, MD 20892-9765.
Introduction:
This study statistically ranked states' performance on adolescent substance use related to cancer risk (past-month cigarette smoking, binge alcohol drinking, and marijuana use).
Methods:
Data came from 69,200 adolescent participants (50 states and the District of Columbia) in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) and 450,050 adolescent participants (47 states) in the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS). Adolescents were aged 14 to 17 years. For 2011-2015, we estimated and ranked states' prevalence of adolescent substance use. We calculated the ranks' 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a Monte Carlo method with 100,000 simulations. Spearman correlations examined consistency of ranks.
Results:
Across states, the prevalence of cigarette smoking was 4.5% to 14.3% in NSDUH and 4.7% to 18.5% in YRBSS. Utah had the lowest prevalence (NSDUH: rank = 51 [95% CI, 47-51]; YRBSS: rank = 47 [95% CI, 46-47]), and states' ranks across surveys were correlated (r = 0.66, P < .001). The prevalence of binge alcohol drinking was 5.9% to 14.3% (NSDUH) and 7.1% to 21.7% (YRBSS). Utah had the lowest prevalence (NSDUH: rank = 50 [95% CI, 40-51]; YRBSS: rank = 47 [95% CI, 47-47]), but ranks across surveys were weakly correlated (r = 0.38, P = .01). The prevalence of marijuana use was 6.3% to 18.7% (NSDUH) and 8.2% to 27.1% (YRBSS). Utah had the lowest prevalence of marijuana use (NSDUH: rank = 50 [95% CI = 33-51]; YRBSS: rank= 46 [95% CI, 46-46]), and ranks across surveys were correlated (r = 0.70, P < .001). Wide CIs for states ranked in the middle of each distribution obscured statistical differences among them.
Conclusion:
Variability emerged across adolescent substance use behaviors and surveys (perhaps because of administration differences). Most states showed statistically equivalent performance on adolescent substance use. Adolescents in all states would benefit from efforts to reduce substance use, to prevent against lifelong morbidity.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Ranks
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

