Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Construction of a Compact Low-Cost Radiation Shield for Air-Temperature Sensors in Ecological Field Studies
Published on: November 6, 2018
Numerical simulations on active shielding methods comparison and wrapped angle optimization for gradient coil design
Yaohui Wang1, Xuegang Xin2, Lei Guo3
1Division of Superconducting Magnet Science and Technology, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Minimizing magnetic fields or secondary magnetic fields in gradient coil design reduces harmful eddy currents in magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary field control offers better performance, but minimizing magnetic fields is preferred for ultra-low eddy currents and stray field control.
Area of Science:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Electromagnetism
- Coil Design
Background:
- Gradient coil current switching in MRI induces eddy currents.
- Eddy currents generate secondary magnetic fields detrimental to image quality.
- Active shielding strategies aim to minimize these effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare two active shielding methods for gradient coils: minimizing cryostat surface magnetic fields versus minimizing imaging region secondary magnetic fields.
- To quantitatively assess stray field and eddy current performance under stringent constraints.
- To optimize a wrapped-edge gradient coil design for enhanced stray field control.
Main Methods:
- Numerical simulations were performed to compare two distinct active shielding strategies.
- Constraints included ultra-low maximum stray field intensity (2 G) and extreme secondary field shielding ratio (0.000001).
- Optimization of a wrapped-edge gradient coil design was conducted.
Main Results:
- The secondary magnetic field control strategy yielded coils with superior overall performance.
- Minimizing magnetic fields on the cryostat surface is preferable for achieving ultra-low eddy currents and strict stray field control at the cryostat's edge.
- Optimized wrapping angles for the x and z coils in the wrapped-edge design were determined to be 40° and 90°, respectively.
Conclusions:
- The choice of active shielding strategy in gradient coil design depends on specific performance requirements.
- For applications demanding minimal eddy currents and precise stray field management, minimizing magnetic fields is the recommended approach.
- The wrapped-edge design offers an effective method for controlling stray fields in MRI gradient coils.
Related Concept Videos
Diamagnetic Shielding of Nuclei: Local Diamagnetic Current
Design Example: Traverse Angle Computations
What is an Electrochemical Gradient?
The chemical gradient relies on differences in the abundance of a substance on the outside versus the inside of a cell and flows from areas of high to low ion concentration. In contrast, the electrical gradient revolves around an...
Numerical Calculations
The solution to a problem is obtained using different methods. While manually solving algebraic symbols is one of the most common methods, the graphical method is often preferred. Computers...
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
Pilot and Numeric Relaying

