Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Non-natriuretic peptide biomarkers in heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction
Evangelos Oikonomou1, Georgia Vogiatzi1, Sotiris Tsalamandris1
1Department of Cardiology, 'Hippokration' Hospital, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, 11528, Greece.
Insights
Novel biomarkers aid in heart failure (HF) management. This review details non-natriuretic peptide biomarkers for HF with preserved and reduced ejection fraction, highlighting their diagnostic and prognostic roles.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarker Research
- Heart Failure Pathophysiology
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) presents as two distinct entities: HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
- While natriuretic peptides are established HF biomarkers, novel non-natriuretic peptide biomarkers offer additional diagnostic and prognostic value.
- Understanding the differences in biomarker application between HFrEF and HFpEF is crucial for effective patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and compare the application of non-natriuretic peptide biomarkers in patients with HF.
- To delineate the distinct roles of these biomarkers in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) versus HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- To summarize the diagnostic and prognostic utility of novel biomarkers beyond natriuretic peptides in HF.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of current research on non-natriuretic peptide biomarkers in heart failure.
- Analysis of studies investigating biomarkers for myocardial fibrosis, renal impairment, and inflammation in HF.
- Comparative assessment of biomarker performance in HFrEF and HFpEF populations.
Main Results:
- Biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis show limited diagnostic yield in acute HF but offer prognostic insights, particularly in HFpEF.
- Biomarkers of renal impairment independently predict worse prognosis in HF, irrespective of ejection fraction.
- Inflammatory markers have not demonstrated consistent utility in patients with systolic or diastolic dysfunction.
Conclusions:
- Non-natriuretic peptide biomarkers provide valuable prognostic information in HF, with varying utility depending on the HF subtype (HFrEF vs. HFpEF).
- Myocardial fibrosis and renal impairment biomarkers are particularly relevant for risk stratification in HF patients.
- Further research is warranted to fully integrate these novel biomarkers into routine HF clinical practice.
Abstract:
Heart failure (HF) with reduced and preserved ejection fraction constitutes two entities with distinct pathogenetic backgrounds sharing common features. Beyond natriuretic peptides, several novel biomarkers have been proven useful in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of HF. Biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis have a low diagnostic yield in subjects with acute HF but may add prognostic information, especially in patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction. Biomarkers of renal impairment identify subjects with worse prognosis independently of left ventricle ejection fraction while inflammatory markers have not been proven useful in patients with systolic or diastolic impairment. In this review article, we summarize the main differences and application of non-natriuretic peptide biomarkers in HF patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

