Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment as a Useful Adjunctive Tool for Pneumonia
Published on: May 6, 2014
Snakebite: An Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjunct Treatment Strategies.
Benjamin J Herzel1,2, Stephen P Samuel3,4, Tommaso C Bulfone5,6
1Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Adding adjunct treatments to standard snakebite care, like antivenom, can be cost-effective. Even a small reduction in severe cases significantly lowers overall treatment costs and improves patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- * Medical Economics
- * Public Health
- * Toxicology
Background:
- * The cost-effectiveness of standard snakebite treatment (antivenom and supportive care) is well-documented.
- * Venomous snakebites remain a significant global health issue, necessitating efficient treatment strategies.
- * Existing research primarily focuses on the efficacy of antivenom, with less emphasis on adjunct therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To determine the cost-effectiveness of incorporating adjunct treatments alongside standard care for venomous snakebites.
- * To identify the economic thresholds at which novel interventions become cost-effective or cost-saving.
- * To model the impact of theoretical adjunct therapies on treatment costs and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- * A threshold cost-effectiveness analysis was employed to evaluate potential adjunct interventions.
- * Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated to compare different treatment strategies.
- * Sensitivity analyses (one-way, scenario, probabilistic) were performed to assess parameter uncertainty and define thresholds.
Main Results:
- * A 3% reduction in severe snakebite cases through an adjunct strategy is projected to decrease overall treatment costs.
- * Even a minimal investment ($10) in an adjunct intervention reducing severe cases by 3% can yield significant cost savings ($75 per individual).
- * Adjunct strategies demonstrated potential for substantial improvements in patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness, even without altering antivenom usage.
Conclusions:
- * Integrating adjunct therapies with standard antivenom and supportive care can enhance the cost-effectiveness of snakebite treatment.
- * Novel adjunct interventions hold promise for improving patient outcomes and potentially reducing healthcare expenditures associated with snakebites.
- * Further research into specific adjunct strategies is warranted to validate these economic and clinical benefits.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Strategies for Psychological Disorders
Psychological therapies focus on modifying emotions, thoughts, and behaviors through talking, interpreting, listening, rewarding, challenging, and modeling. Clinical psychologists, counselors, and social workers commonly practice psychotherapy. Clinical...
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Buffer Effectiveness
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
Persuasion Strategies
Framing Effects
Coping Strategies: Problem Focused
For example, consider a student who struggles to understand their...

