Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

11.5K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.5K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.2K
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups01:09

Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups

6.0K
Substituents on the benzene ring that direct an incoming electrophile to undergo substitution at the meta position are called meta directors. All meta directors either have a positive charge on the atom directly bonded to the ring or a partial positive charge. These groups function by withdrawing electrons from the ring through inductive and resonance effects. Consider the carbocation intermediates formed upon the addition of an electrophile on nitrobenzene at the...
6.0K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.4K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence and Impact of Social Risk in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: National Estimates From the United States.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association·2025
Same author

AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Role of Biomarkers for the Management of Crohn's Disease.

Gastroenterology·2023
Same author

Integrating Evidence to Guide Use of Biologics and Small Molecules for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Gastroenterology·2023
Same author

Pharmacological Therapies for the Management of Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of Crohn's & colitis·2023
Same author

Quantifying Endoscopic Activity in Ulcerative Colitis: Innovation, Powered by Artificial Intelligence.

Gastroenterology·2023
Same author

Common Instances of Low-value Care in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.6K

A Primer on Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Nghia H Nguyen1, Siddharth Singh2,3

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.

Seminars in Liver Disease
|June 6, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This review outlines a systematic approach to synthesizing biomedical evidence. It details steps for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses to inform clinical practice and identify research gaps.

More Related Videos

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
10:17

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Published on: October 5, 2017

9.3K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.6K
Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
10:17

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Published on: October 5, 2017

9.3K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Literature Synthesis
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • The exponential growth of biomedical literature necessitates robust methods for evidence synthesis.
  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses provide objective approaches to appraise and synthesize research.
  • These methods are crucial for informing clinical practice and identifying knowledge gaps.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive step-by-step guide for conducting systematic reviews.
  • To outline best practices for evidence synthesis in biomedical research.
  • To facilitate the critical appraisal of scientific literature for clinical application.

Main Methods:

  • Formulating focused, clinically relevant research questions.
  • Developing detailed review protocols with clear inclusion/exclusion criteria.
  • Conducting systematic literature searches across multiple databases and grey literature.
  • Performing independent data abstraction and risk of bias assessment.
  • Utilizing quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) and transparent quality assessment.

Main Results:

  • A structured methodology for systematic review execution.
  • Identification of key steps including protocol design, literature search, data extraction, bias assessment, and synthesis.
  • Emphasis on independent verification and transparent reporting of evidence quality.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic reviews are essential for navigating complex biomedical evidence.
  • Adherence to a rigorous, step-by-step process ensures reliable synthesis and critical appraisal.
  • This approach enhances the utility of evidence for clinical decision-making and future research directions.