Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
Published on: October 25, 2024
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair with Mesh: Mid-Term Efficacy and Complications
Laura Mateu Arrom1, Carlos Errando Smet1, Cristina Gutierrez Ruiz1
1Department of Female and Functional Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Introduction:
Our aim was to assess the efficacy and complications of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) correction with transvaginal mesh (TVM).
Materials And Methods:
We retrospectively assessed patients who had undergone a repair of an apical (primary or recurrent) or recurrent POP using TVM in our department since 2007. Meshes used were Prolift®, Elevate®, and Surelift®. Satisfaction with surgery was assessed on a 0-10 scale.
Results:
A total of 83 patients were included (33 Prolift®, 36 Elevate®, 14 Surelift®), with a mean age of 67.8 ± 9.7 years. Eighteen (21.6%) patients underwent a recurrent POP correction. Follow-up was 49 ± 34 months. Twelve (14.4%) symptomatic recurrences were identified, 3 of which required further surgery. Satisfaction was 8.7. Four (4.8%) vaginal exposures were detected, 2 of which required partial mesh removal. Three (3.6%) cases of dyspareunia and 1 (1.2%) case of mild pelvic pain were reported, which did not require further treatment.
Conclusion:
The use of TVM for apical or recurrent POP repair is effective and is associated with a high satisfaction rate while complications are infrequent.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Efficacy
Mismatch Repair
Mesh Analysis
A fundamental concept in mesh analysis is the definition of meshes and mesh currents. A mesh is a closed...
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
Nucleotide Excision Repair

