Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Attitudes01:54

Attitudes

33.2K
Attitude is our evaluation of a person, an idea, or an object. We have attitudes for many things ranging from products that we might pick up in the supermarket to people around the world to political policies. Typically, attitudes are favorable or unfavorable: positive or negative (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993). And, they have three components: an affective component (feelings), a behavioral component (the effect of the attitude on behavior), and a cognitive component (belief and knowledge;...
33.2K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

67.9K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
67.9K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

269.2K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
269.2K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

65.8K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
65.8K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

89.1K
Scientific Laws
89.1K
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

9.5K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
9.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inconsistent ethics reporting in individual participant data meta-analyses: a call for updating PRISMA and PRISMA-IPD.

BMC medicine·2026
Same author

Ethics and Regulation of Human Brain Organoid Research: Recommendations from the Asia Pacific Neuroethics Working Group.

Asian bioethics review·2026
Same author

Artificial autonomy and algorithmic paternalism: AI shaping human autonomy and decision-making.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Intensive care decision-making, survival and dying well: a mixed methods study with people who have been intensive care patients.

Anaesthesia·2026
Same author

Neural Organoids: How Should We Handle the Possibility of Sentience? - CORRIGENDUM.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same author

The case for primary prevention of obesity in the era of GLP-1 therapies.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Drosophila Passive Avoidance Behavior as a New Paradigm to Study Associative Aversive Learning
06:20

Drosophila Passive Avoidance Behavior as a New Paradigm to Study Associative Aversive Learning

Published on: October 15, 2021

4.3K

Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior.

Søren Holm1,2, Bjørn Hofmann2,3

  • 1a Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.

Accountability in Research
|June 8, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Doctoral students

Keywords:
Dishonestydoctoral studentsfabricationfalsificationintegritymisbehaviormisconductplagiarismscience ethics

More Related Videos

Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay
09:21

Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay

Published on: June 17, 2010

50.6K
Measuring Associative Learning in Chemotaxis of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
09:53

Measuring Associative Learning in Chemotaxis of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: June 17, 2025

644

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Drosophila Passive Avoidance Behavior as a New Paradigm to Study Associative Aversive Learning
06:20

Drosophila Passive Avoidance Behavior as a New Paradigm to Study Associative Aversive Learning

Published on: October 15, 2021

4.3K
Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay
09:21

Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay

Published on: June 17, 2010

50.6K
Measuring Associative Learning in Chemotaxis of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
09:53

Measuring Associative Learning in Chemotaxis of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: June 17, 2025

644

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Sciences
  • Research Ethics
  • Academic Integrity

Background:

  • Scientific misconduct poses a significant threat to research integrity.
  • Understanding factors influencing research misbehavior in early-career scientists is crucial.
  • Doctoral candidates are at a critical stage for developing research conduct norms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between doctoral students' attitudes toward scientific misconduct and their self-reported behaviors.
  • To identify common forms of scientific misbehavior among doctoral candidates in biomedicine.
  • To explore factors associated with scientific misbehavior, such as prior ethics education.

Main Methods:

  • A questionnaire survey was administered to 203 doctoral candidates at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo.
  • The study utilized the Kalichman scale and the Research Misbehavior Severity Score (RMSS) to assess attitudes and behaviors.
  • Response rate was 74%, providing a robust dataset for analysis.

Main Results:

  • A significant correlation was found between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported problematic behaviors.
  • Common misbehaviors included improper authorship, data manipulation, overlooking flawed data, and misrepresenting findings.
  • Scientific misbehavior correlated with undergraduate study location and prior science ethics lectures.

Conclusions:

  • Attitudes towards scientific misconduct are linked to actual misbehavior among doctoral students in biomedicine.
  • Early intervention and education on research ethics may be vital for fostering integrity in early-career researchers.
  • The study validates instruments for measuring attitudes and behaviors related to scientific misconduct.