Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Evaluation of Zika Virus-specific T-cell Responses in Immunoprivileged Organs of Infected Ifnar1-/- Mice
Published on: October 17, 2018
Zika virus infection estimates, Mexico
Juan Eugenio Hernández-Ávila1, Lina Sofía Palacio-Mejía2, Hugo López-Gatell1
1National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
The Zika virus epidemic in Mexico was significantly larger than reported, with an estimated 60,172 symptomatic cases. This outbreak was linked to a 2.9-fold increase in microcephaly risk, particularly in lower altitudes.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Public Health
Background:
- Zika virus infection poses a significant public health threat, particularly to pregnant women and their developing fetuses.
- Understanding the true scale of Zika virus epidemics is crucial for effective public health response and resource allocation.
- Congenital microcephaly is a serious birth defect associated with maternal Zika virus infection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the actual magnitude of the Zika virus epidemic in Mexico.
- To assess the association between Zika virus infection and the risk of microcephaly in Mexico.
- To analyze geographical and altitudinal factors influencing Zika virus transmission and microcephaly risk.
Main Methods:
- Estimated symptomatic Zika virus infections by analyzing reported cases and birth rates in Mexico (November 2015 - August 2016).
- Compared monthly incidences of congenital microcephaly before and after Zika virus introduction using birth certificate data (January 2010 - September 2017).
- Utilized Poisson interrupted time series, statistical modeling, and graphical analyses, stratifying by maternal altitude (≥2200m).
Main Results:
- Estimated symptomatic Zika cases (60,172) were 7.3 times higher than reported cases.
- A significant 2.9-fold increase in microcephaly incidence was observed post-Zika introduction (IRR: 2.9; 95% CI: 2.3-3.6).
- Babies born to mothers at altitudes below 2200m showed a higher microcephaly risk (IRR: 3.4; 95% CI: 2.9-3.9).
Conclusions:
- The Zika virus epidemic in Mexico was substantially underestimated by laboratory-confirmed case counts.
- Zika virus infection is significantly associated with an increased risk of microcephaly.
- Altitude is a critical factor, with lower altitudes showing a greater risk of microcephaly associated with Zika virus.
Related Concept Videos
What are Viruses?
What are Estimates?
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
Estimation of k and VD of Aminoglycosides
Estimation of the Physical Quantities
Estimating Population Standard Deviation
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...

