Related Concept Videos
Indicators
Language
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
Components of Language
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Language and Cognition
Pleural Disorders: Types and Brief Description
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
How deafness may emerge as a disability as social interactions unfold.
Exploring lexical gaps in Australian Sign Language for the purposes of health communication.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction.
Lindsay Ferrara1, Gabrielle Hodge2
1Department of Language and Literature, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
This study proposes a unified theory of language, viewing it as coordinated action using diverse communication methods like describing, indicating, and depicting. This approach integrates various semiotic repertoires for face-to-face interactions.
Area of Science:
- Linguistics
- Semiotics
- Anthropology
- Gesture Studies
Background:
- Face-to-face communication involves coordinating expressive actions using varied semiotic repertoires.
- Linguistics has overemphasized arbitrary symbolic pairings, neglecting other semiotics crucial for communication.
- Diverse communicative practices (e.g., deaf, hearing) lack a unifying theoretical framework.
Purpose of the Study:
- To promote a comprehensive theory of language that integrates diverse human semiotic repertoires in face-to-face communication.
- To facilitate direct comparison across different communicative ecologies.
- To expand the understanding of language beyond conventionalized symbols to include all communicative actions.
Main Methods:
- Building on Clark's (1996) theory of language use as 'actioned'.
- Analyzing three fundamental signaling methods: describing, indicating, and depicting.
- Examining the use of these methods within multimodal 'composite utterances' (Enfield, 2009).
Main Results:
- Diverse semiotic resources are coordinated in situated human interactions.
- All three signaling methods (describing, indicating, depicting) are essential components of communication.
- Multimodal composite utterances are jointly created using a combination of signaling methods.
Conclusions:
- A robust theory of language must account for all signaling methods within composite utterances.
- Language, viewed as action, encompasses the intentional use of available semiotic resources.
- This framework unifies diverse communicative practices under a single theoretical model.

