Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-sphenoidal Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas
Published on: January 17, 2018
Reliability of computer-assisted periacetabular osteotomy using a minimally invasive approach
Sepp De Raedt1, Inger Mechlenburg2,3, Maiken Stilling2,3
1Department of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansensgade 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. Sepp.De.Raedt@clin.au.dk.
Computer navigation is reliable for minimally invasive periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), showing good agreement with manual measurements and a significant decrease in hip joint peak-pressure. This technology can aid surgeons in improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomedical engineering
- Medical imaging
Background:
- Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a key procedure for developmental hip dysplasia in young patients.
- The goal of PAO is to normalize hip joint geometry, reduce peak pressure, and prevent osteoarthritis.
- PAO is technically challenging, and computer navigation has not been previously validated for minimally invasive approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the use of computer navigation in minimally invasive transsartorial periacetabular osteotomy.
- To assess the accuracy of computer-assisted angle measurements compared to manual measurements.
- To evaluate the impact of computer-assisted PAO on hip joint peak-pressure.
Main Methods:
- Computer-assisted PAO was performed on ten patients.
- Pre- and postoperative CT scans were used for 3D modeling and analysis.
- The Biomechanical Guidance System was employed for intra-operative measurements and calculations.
- Manual measurements were conducted for comparison, with statistical analysis including ICC and Bland-Altman plots.
Main Results:
- Computer navigation showed good agreement with manual angle measurements (ICC 0.94-0.98).
- Significant differences were noted for posterior sector and acetabular anteversion angles.
- Hip joint peak-pressure decreased by a mean of 13% postoperatively.
Conclusions:
- Computer navigation is a reliable tool for minimally invasive transsartorial PAO.
- The system demonstrates good agreement with manual measurements and effectively reduces joint peak-pressure.
- Further research with larger cohorts is needed to confirm the association with clinical outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Distribution Reliability and Automation
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Information Processing Approach

