Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Discovering Middle Ear Anatomy by Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery: A Dissection Manual
Published on: January 11, 2018
Surgical Impact of Coupling an Active Middle Ear Implant to Short Incus Process
Sebastian P Schraven1, Kristen Rak2, Mario Cebulla2
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Koerner", University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock.
Introduction:
Since 1996 the active middle-ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) is used to treat mild-to-severe sensorineural hearing losses. The former standard surgical approach for incus vibroplasty included a mastoidectomy and a posterior tympanotomy, crimping the Floating-Mass Transducer (FMT) to the long incus process. The introduction of the short process (SP) coupler allows the attachment of the FMT to the incus body making the procedure of a posterior tympanotomy unnecessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the duration of surgery (surgical case length) and to compare the audiological results of SP coupling with the former standard surgical approach to the long incus process.
Materials And Methods:
Patients undergoing an incus vibroplasty between October 2009 and February 2016 were included in this cohort study. The patients received an incus vibroplasty with crimping the FMT to the long incus process (former standard application) (n = 25) and with the SP coupler (n = 17) respectively. The surgical case length as well as the functional audiological outcome was assessed 12 months postoperatively using pure-tone audiometry and speech audiometry.
Results:
The surgical case length was significantly shorter in the SP coupler group compared to the standard application incus vibroplasty (85 ± 29 min vs. 114 ± 50 min). Additionally, patients receiving the SP coupler had an increased speech perception if compared to the standard application (Freiburger monosyllables at 65 dB SPL: 76.1 ± 16.1% vs. 66.2 ± 23.5%).
Conclusion:
The SP coupler leads to a shortened time of surgery and by the less invasive surgery to reduced risks for facial nerve and chorda tympani. Speech perception is significantly improved by SP coupling compared to classic long incus coupling.
More Related Videos
07:40Dissection of the Auditory Bulla in Postnatal Mice: Isolation of the Middle Ear Bones and Histological Analysis
Published on: January 4, 2017
07:00Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
Related Concept Videos
G-protein Coupled Receptors
Anatomy of the Ear
Impact of Groups on Groups
Short-distance Transport of Resources
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...