Outcomes of 4838 patients requiring temporary transvenous cardiac pacing: A statewide cohort study

Temporary-transvenous-cardiac-pacing (TTCP) is a potentially lifesaving procedure, however trends in its utilization and outcomes in unselected contemporary populations are all unknown.

Consecutive patients requiring TTCP between July-1, 2000 and December-31, 2013 were identified from a statewide registry of admitted patients. In addition, all patients who underwent other cardiac procedures including permanent-pacemaker (PPM) implantation, automated-implantable-cardiac-defibrillator (AICD) implantation, percutaneous-coronary-intervention (PCI), or coronary-artery-bypass-graft (CABG) surgery were identified for comparative outcome analyses. Survival was tracked from a statewide death registry.

A total of 4838 patients (mean age [±standard deviation] 74.7 ± 12.7 years; 58.0% males) requiring TTCP were identified. The incidence for TTCP was 5.86 ± 1.06 cases per-100,000-persons-per-annum, declining by 46% between 2003 and 2013. During 4.2 ± 3.7 years of follow-up, 2594 (53.6%) patients died, of whom 569 (11.8%) died during the index admission. Weekend admission was associated with increased mortality compared to weekdays (hazard ratio: 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.26, p = 0.002) and independently predicted all-cause death. After adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, and referral source for admission, patients requiring TTCP had worse survival than those undergoing PPM (n = 17,988) or AICD (n = 5264) implantation, PCI (n = 46,859), or CABG surgery (n = 50,992) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.14, 95% CI 1.94-2.37; aHR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.41-1.83; aHR: 1.76, 95% CI 1.61-1.93; aHR: 2.09, 95% CI 1.98-2.21 respectively, all p < 0.001).

TTCP utilization is decreasing and is associated with substantial in-hospital and long-term mortality with weekend-weekday variation in outcome. Further studies are needed to develop strategies to better understand the determinants of adverse outcomes of these patients, as well as appropriate strategies for outcome improvement.