Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs

FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs

Post-approval, manufacturers may modify an approved new or generic drug product. Such modifications can encompass alterations in the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API), manufacturing process, formulation, batch size, manufacturing site, and container closure system (FDA Guidance for Industry, April 2004). Often, a drug product may undergo multiple changes.These modifications require careful evaluation to determine their potential impact on the drug product's identity, strength, quality,...

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Values in challenging times: strategic crisis management in the EU.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2023

Same author

End-of-Life at the Time of COVID-19.

The Neurohospitalist·2021

Same author

WASP (write a scientific paper): The ethical stages of publishing a research paper.

Saudi journal of anaesthesia·2019

Same author

WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): The right to privacy.

Early human development·2018

Same author

WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Informed consent in research.

Early human development·2018

Same author

WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Ethics approval for a research study (2).

Early human development·2018

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Optimizing the Rearing Procedure of Germ-Free Wasps

Author Spotlight: Optimizing the Rearing Procedure of Germ-Free Wasps

Published on: July 21, 2023

WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Ethics approval for a research study (1).

Pierre Mallia¹

¹Bioethics Research Programme, Medical School, University of Malta, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta.

Early Human Development

|June 9, 2018

Summary

Ethical research is crucial for medical advancement and public trust. This study reviews participant rights, researcher obligations, and the EU Directive on Good Clinical Practice.

Keywords:

EU directive Ethics approval Information Obligations Research ethics committees Rights

More Related Videos

Evaluation of the Productivity of Social Wasp Colonies Vespinae and an Introduction to the Traditional Japanese Vespula Wasp Hunting Technique

Evaluation of the Productivity of Social Wasp Colonies Vespinae and an Introduction to the Traditional Japanese Vespula Wasp Hunting Technique

Published on: September 11, 2019

An Introduction to Parasitic Wasps of Drosophila and the Antiparasite Immune Response

An Introduction to Parasitic Wasps of Drosophila and the Antiparasite Immune Response

Published on: May 7, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Optimizing the Rearing Procedure of Germ-Free Wasps

Author Spotlight: Optimizing the Rearing Procedure of Germ-Free Wasps

Published on: July 21, 2023

Evaluation of the Productivity of Social Wasp Colonies Vespinae and an Introduction to the Traditional Japanese Vespula Wasp Hunting Technique

Evaluation of the Productivity of Social Wasp Colonies Vespinae and an Introduction to the Traditional Japanese Vespula Wasp Hunting Technique

Published on: September 11, 2019

An Introduction to Parasitic Wasps of Drosophila and the Antiparasite Immune Response

An Introduction to Parasitic Wasps of Drosophila and the Antiparasite Immune Response

Published on: May 7, 2012

Area of Science:

Medical Ethics
Clinical Research

Background:

Ethical considerations are paramount in scientific research to uphold public trust and ensure medical advancement.
Past experiences highlight the negative consequences of compromised research ethics on public perception and scientific progress.

Purpose of the Study:

To emphasize the importance of ethics in scientific research, particularly in clinical trials.
To detail the rights of research participants and the obligations of researchers.
To review the European Union's Directive on Good Clinical Practice and the role of Research Ethics Committees.

Main Methods:

Review of ethical principles in scientific research.
Analysis of participant rights and researcher obligations in clinical trials.
Examination of the EU Directive on Good Clinical Practice and its twelve principles.
Discussion on the function and composition of Research Ethics Committees.

Main Results:

Ethical research is fundamental for maintaining public trust in medicine.
Clear understanding and adherence to participant rights and researcher obligations are essential.
The EU Directive provides a framework for good clinical practice.
Research Ethics Committees play a vital role in safeguarding participants and research quality.

Conclusions:

Upholding stringent ethical standards in research is imperative for scientific integrity and public confidence.
Compliance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and effective oversight by Research Ethics Committees are critical for ethical research conduct.
Protecting participant rights and ensuring researcher accountability are key to advancing medical science responsibly.