Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Primary versus secondary anastomosis in intestinal atresia
Margot M Hillyer1, Katherine J Baxter1, Matthew S Clifton1
1Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Insights
Primary anastomosis (PA) offers better outcomes for neonates with intestinal atresia (IA) than secondary anastomosis (SA). Surgeon preference significantly influences procedure choice, impacting patient recovery.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Neonatal Care
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
Background:
- Neonates with intestinal atresia (IA) require surgical intervention.
- Two primary surgical approaches exist: primary anastomosis (PA) and ostomy creation with secondary anastomosis (SA).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of PA versus SA in neonates with IA.
- To identify factors influencing the selection between PA and SA.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 92 neonates with IA (2009-2015).
- Analysis of patient characteristics, operative details, and outcomes.
- Logistic regression used to assess surgeon-level preferences.
Main Results:
- PA (76.1%) was more common than SA (23.9%).
- PA associated with shorter hospitalizations, reduced parenteral nutrition duration, and fewer readmissions compared to SA.
- Higher Apgar scores and uncomplicated atresia favored PA; surgeon preference varied widely and was independent of patient factors.
Conclusions:
- Primary anastomosis demonstrates superior outcomes for neonates with intestinal atresia.
- While neonate's clinical status influences procedural choice, surgeon preference plays a substantial role.
Purpose:
Neonates with intestinal atresia (IA) undergo either primary anastomosis (PA) or ostomy creation with secondary anastomosis (SA). Our purpose was to compare outcomes for PA and SA and to assess factors influencing procedure selection.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of neonates with IA between 2009 and 2015. Patient characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were collected. Surgeon-level preferences (defined as performing >50% PA or SA) were assessed using logistic regression.
Results:
Of 92 IA patients, 70 (76.1%) underwent PA and 22 (23.9%) underwent SA. Neonates with PA had shorter hospitalizations (27 days vs. 95 days, p < 0.001), shorter total parenteral nutrition duration (19 days vs. 74.5 days, p < 0.001), and fewer readmissions (33.3% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.024). On multivariable regression analysis, higher Apgar scores (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.16, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.20-14.29) and uncomplicated atresia (OR 3.97, 95% CI 1.37-11.48) were associated with PA. At the surgeon-level, utilization of PA varied from 43.5% to 100%. Surgeon preference is not influenced by the demographic, presentation, or surgical findings of this patient population.
Conclusions:
PA has better outcomes than SA. Though procedural selection is influenced by the clinical status of the neonate, however surgeon preference plays a significant role in this clinical decision.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III Treatment Study.
Related Concept Videos
Primary and Secondary Growth in Roots and Shoots
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
Secondary Active Transport
Secondary Active Transport
Anatomy of the Intestines
Small Intestines
The small intestine is an ~7 meter-long tube with an inner diameter of just 2.5 cm. Since most nutrients are absorbed here, the inner lining of the...
Secondary Healthcare System

