Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.9K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.9K
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K
Valence Bond Theory02:45

Valence Bond Theory

50.3K
Overview of Valence Bond Theory
50.3K
Band Theory02:35

Band Theory

17.3K
When two or more atoms come together to form a molecule, their atomic orbitals combine and molecular orbitals of distinct energies result. In a solid, there are a large number of atoms, and therefore a large number of atomic orbitals that may be combined into molecular orbitals. These groups of molecular orbitals are so closely placed together to form continuous regions of energies, known as the bands.
The energy difference between these bands is known as the band gap.
Conductor, Semiconductor,...
17.3K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

89.1K
Scientific Laws
89.1K
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

13.8K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Highly Improved Sensitivity of FET Sensors Based on a Pulsed Temperature Profile for Lead Ion Detection.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Fecal microbiota transplantation promotes Wnt3a-mediated hippocampal neurogenesis in a rat model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion.

Journal of translational medicine·2026
Same author

Monophosphate Derivatives of Luteolin and Apigenin as Efficient Precursors with Improved Oral Bioavailability in Rats.

Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Association of Longitudinal Changes in Cerebral Microstructure with Cognitive Functioning in Breast Cancer Survivors after Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

Journal of clinical medicine·2024
Same author

Work performance and its clinical correlates in patients with chronic mental illness: The Chinese version of Vocational Cognitive Rating Scale and the work behavior inventory.

Psychiatric rehabilitation journal·2023
Same author

Combined VEGF and bFGF loaded nanofiber membrane protects against neuronal injury and hypomyelination in a rat model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion.

International immunopharmacology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K

A Multivariate Generalizability Theory Approach to Standard Setting.

Yi-Fang Wu1, Hueying Tzou2

  • 1University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.

Applied Psychological Measurement
|June 9, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Generalizability theory (G theory) enhances standard setting accuracy by quantifying variance in cut scores. This study uses multivariate G theory to assess how panel size and test length impact cut score precision.

Keywords:
multivariate generalizability theorystandard errorsstandard settingthe modified Angoff method

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
06:59

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings

Published on: November 9, 2016

31.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
06:59

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings

Published on: November 9, 2016

31.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Educational Measurement
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Standard setting procedures for determining cut scores can be complex and involve multiple sources of variance.
  • Generalizability theory (G theory) offers a framework to assess and quantify these variances.
  • Existing methods may not fully capture the nuances of complex standard setting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply multivariate Generalizability theory to estimate standard errors of cut scores.
  • To investigate the impact of varying panel sizes and test lengths on the precision of standard setting.
  • To demonstrate the practical utility of multivariate G theory in educational measurement.

Main Methods:

  • Application of a multivariate single-facet design within G theory.
  • Utilization of multivariate D study designs to simulate different conditions.
  • Analysis of variance components related to cut score determination.

Main Results:

  • Multivariate G theory effectively estimates standard errors for cut scores.
  • Panel size and test length significantly influence the precision of the standard setting process.
  • The study identified optimal configurations for panel size and test length.

Conclusions:

  • Multivariate G theory provides a robust and practical approach for assessing cut score accuracy.
  • Understanding variance sources is crucial for reliable standard setting.
  • The findings offer guidance for optimizing standard setting procedures in educational and psychological assessments.