Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

11.8K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
11.8K
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions01:19

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

179
Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
179
Multiple Allele Traits01:49

Multiple Allele Traits

38.2K
The Concept of Multiple Allelism
38.2K
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

4.0K
Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
4.0K
Factors Affecting α-Alkylation of Ketones: Choice of Base01:10

Factors Affecting α-Alkylation of Ketones: Choice of Base

3.6K
α-Alkylation of ketones is achieved in the presence of alkyl halides and a base. The reaction proceeds via the formation of an enolate ion followed by nucleophilic substitution. The choice of base employed is essential as it is the key factor in determining the reaction outcome.
The reaction involving bases like EtO− whose conjugate acid EtOH (pKa = 15.9) is stronger than the ketone (pKa = 19.2) results in an equilibrium mixture with higher ketone concentration. As a consequence,...
3.6K
Multiple Voltage Sources01:25

Multiple Voltage Sources

1.8K
Generally, a single battery is not enough to power some devices. In such cases, batteries can be combined in two ways: in series or in parallel.
In series, the positive terminal of one battery is connected to the negative terminal of another battery. Hence, the voltage of each battery is added to give the net voltage, which is increased because each battery boosts the electrons that enter it. The same current flows through each battery because they are connected in series.
Batteries are...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Categorizing health beliefs among cancer survivors using latent profile analysis to identify targets for promoting medication adherence and quality of life.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Tracking fraction knowledge development using grade-appropriate assessments.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same author

Ecological Momentary Assessment as a Measure of Intervention Change: Evaluation in 4 Digital Mental Health Trials.

Journal of medical Internet research·2025
Same author

IRT-based response style models and related methodology: Review and commentary.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2025
Same author

Erratum: Genotype-Phenotype Association for 14 <i>GFAP</i> Variants in Alexander Disease.

Neurology. Genetics·2025
Same author

Recognizing improved Complex Figure memory assessment: The Emory 4-choice Complex Figure recognition task.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2025
Same journal

babebi: An R Package for Bayesian Estimation and Validation in Small-N Two-Rater Pre-Post Designs.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

A Tool for Agreement and Alignment Analysis in Binary Rating Tasks: The R Package scindex.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

The EM Algorithm and Its Variants in Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Comparing Their Propensity for Boundaries, Extremes, Convergence, and Suboptimal Solutions.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

When Perceptions of Social Desirability Differ: Implications for the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model of Faking.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

csemGT: An R Package for Estimating Raw-Score Conditional Standard Errors of Measurement in Generalizability Theory.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Confirmatory Factor Analysis with Adaptive Quadrature Estimator Using Four Link Functions.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System
07:55

The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System

Published on: April 14, 2021

4.5K

A Sequential IRT Model for Multiple-Choice Items and a Multidimensional Extension.

Sien Deng1, Daniel M Bolt1

  • 1University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

Applied Psychological Measurement
|June 9, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a sequential response model for multiple-choice tests, suggesting distinct proficiencies for recognizing and correcting errors. This new model offers a stepwise approach to understanding test-taker behavior.

Keywords:
multiple-choice itemssentence correction testsequential response

More Related Videos

Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects
08:24

Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects

Published on: May 14, 2008

17.6K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 9, 2026

The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System
07:55

The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System

Published on: April 14, 2021

4.5K
Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects
08:24

Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects

Published on: May 14, 2008

17.6K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Educational Measurement
  • Psychometrics
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Traditional multiple-choice models often assume simultaneous comparison of all options.
  • Alternative theories suggest a stepwise evaluation process for response options.
  • Existing models may not fully capture the cognitive steps involved in complex item responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a sequential response model for multiple-choice items (SRM-MC).
  • To model distinct proficiencies associated with separate cognitive steps in item solving.
  • To compare the proposed SRM-MC against established simultaneous response models.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a sequential response model for multiple-choice items (SRM-MC).
  • Application of the SRM-MC to a sentence correction test.
  • Estimation of model parameters using a fully Bayesian approach.
  • Empirical comparison of SRM-MC against competing statistical models.

Main Results:

  • Empirical data supported the proposed sequential response model.
  • The model demonstrated distinct proficiencies for error recognition and error correction steps.
  • The SRM-MC provided a better fit to the data compared to simultaneous models.

Conclusions:

  • The sequential evaluation of response options is a viable process for certain multiple-choice tests.
  • The SRM-MC effectively models distinct cognitive steps and associated proficiencies.
  • This approach enhances the understanding of item response processes in educational and psychological assessments.