Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.4K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.4K
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods01:08

Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods

620
Renal clearance is a critical parameter encompassing kidney filtration, secretion, and reabsorption processes. It is calculated using a specific equation to determine the rate at which the kidneys clear a drug.
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
620
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.2K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

56.1K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Doubly regularized generalized linear models for spatial observations with high-dimensional covariates.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics·2026
Same author

Psychosocial Outcomes in Telemedicine and Long-Acting Incretin-Specific Behavioral Intervention.

Obesity science & practice·2026
Same author

Intraindividual cognitive variability predicts amyloid beta, tau PET, and dementia conversion in Down syndrome: a potential marker of cognitive resilience.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Building an Interoperable Rare Disease Multi-omic Resource: The GREGoR Data Model and Dataset.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Covariate-Adjusted Inference for Differential Analysis of High-Dimensional Networks.

Sankhya. Series A. (2008)·2026
Same author

Digital Atlases to Unlock the Potential of Brain Biorepository Tissues for Interdisciplinary Research.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Interpretable machine learning for Parkinson's disease diagnosis, staging, and biological mechanism exploration: a multicenter analysis.

BioData mining·2026
Same journal

Learning a distance for the clustering of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

BioData mining·2026
Same journal

Multi-domain feature fusion with variational mode decomposition and hybrid LightGBM-Logistic Regression for multi-class seizure classification.

BioData mining·2026
Same journal

Large-scale transcriptomic data mining using explainable XGBoost and SHAP reveals shared biomarkers and molecular mechanisms between type-2 diabetes and triple-negative breast cancer for drug repurposing.

BioData mining·2026
Same journal

AVSeg-XAI: Deep learning framework for A/V segmentation with vascular features reveals retinal oculomics as biomarker for cardiovascular disease.

BioData mining·2026
Same journal

Navigating the uncharted: AI-driven advances in protein structure, dynamics, interactions and ligand interactions for understudied families.

BioData mining·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

18.3K

Gene set analysis methods: a systematic comparison.

Ravi Mathur1,2,3, Daniel Rotroff1,2, Jun Ma1,2

  • 11Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC USA.

Biodata Mining
|June 9, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares gene set analysis methods using the FANGS simulation tool. Results offer guidance on method selection and default settings for analyzing gene expression data.

Keywords:
Gene set analysisMethods comparisonPathway analysis

More Related Videos

Reporter-based Growth Assay for Systematic Analysis of Protein Degradation
07:47

Reporter-based Growth Assay for Systematic Analysis of Protein Degradation

Published on: November 6, 2014

11.1K
Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists
05:22

Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists

Published on: August 11, 2023

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 9, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

18.3K
Reporter-based Growth Assay for Systematic Analysis of Protein Degradation
07:47

Reporter-based Growth Assay for Systematic Analysis of Protein Degradation

Published on: November 6, 2014

11.1K
Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists
05:22

Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists

Published on: August 11, 2023

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Gene set analysis (GSA) is crucial for interpreting high-dimensional gene expression data.
  • Numerous GSA methods exist, but systematic comparisons are scarce.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically compare commonly used gene set analysis methods.
  • To provide empirical guidance for selecting appropriate GSA tools and settings.

Main Methods:

  • A semi-synthetic simulation study using real datasets.
  • Development and application of the Flexible Algorithm for Novel Gene set Simulation (FANGS) pipeline.
  • Comparison of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), Significance Analysis of Function and Expression (SAFE), sigPathway, and Correlation Adjusted Mean RAnk (CAMERA) methods using MSigDB gene sets.

Main Results:

  • Evaluation of false positive rates and statistical power for each method.
  • Assessment of method sensitivity to varying effect sizes.
  • Recommendations on the utility of default settings for tested GSA methods.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides empirical guidance for users of gene set analysis methods.
  • The FANGS software is publicly available for further method comparisons and simulations.