Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Direct Bioprinting of 3D Multicellular Breast Spheroids onto Endothelial Networks
Published on: November 2, 2020
Engineering Breast Cancer Microenvironments and 3D Bioprinting
Jorge A Belgodere1, Connor T King1, Jacob B Bursavich1
1Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
Three-dimensional (3D) culture models better mimic native breast cancer microenvironments than 2D models. Emerging technologies and biophysical properties are key to engineering these complex, physiologically relevant models for improved cancer research.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cancer Biology
- Extracellular Matrix Research
Background:
- The extracellular matrix (ECM) significantly influences tumor growth and metastasis.
- Traditional two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models inadequately represent the complex breast cancer microenvironment.
- Physiologically relevant three-dimensional (3D) models are essential for understanding cancer progression and treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the definition of cancer microenvironments, including stromal components and cell-ECM interactions.
- To summarize emerging technologies for creating biomimetic breast cancer microenvironments.
- To highlight biophysical differences in ECM between primary tumors and metastatic sites, focusing on cancer stem cells.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on breast cancer microenvironment components and engineering strategies.
- Categorization of technologies into biochemical factors and 3D bioprinting methods.
- Discussion of perfusable scaffolds, tumor stiffness, supporting cells, and complex patterning.
Main Results:
- 3D culture models offer superior recapitulation of native tumor architecture and cell interactions compared to 2D models.
- Biochemical factors (matrix proteins, soluble factors, biomaterials) and 3D bioprinting are crucial for engineering relevant microenvironments.
- Biophysical properties of the ECM, particularly in metastatic sites, modulate cancer stem cell behavior and patient prognosis.
Conclusions:
- Advanced 3D culture systems are necessary to accurately model breast cancer progression and metastasis.
- Engineering breast cancer microenvironments requires integrating biochemical and biophysical cues, including cell-ECM interactions.
- Further investigation into understudied ECM proteins may reveal novel therapeutic targets and improve patient outcome prediction.
Related Concept Videos
The Tumor Microenvironment
What is Genetic Engineering?
Heat Engines
Whenever we consider heat engines (and associated devices such as refrigerators and heat pumps), we do not use the standard sign convention for heat and work. For convenience, we assume that the symbols Qh, Qc, and W represent only the amounts of heat transferred...
Internal Combustion Engine
Cancer
What is Cancer?
Although people have known about cancer for centuries, it was only in 1761 that Giovanni Morgagni of Padua performed a detailed autopsy of...

