Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Optical Clearing of the Mouse Central Nervous System Using Passive CLARITY
Published on: June 30, 2016
Audit of practice in Australasian hyperbaric units on the incidence of central nervous system oxygen toxicity
Susannah Sherlock1,2,3, Mandy Way4, Alexis Tabah3,5
1Corresponding author: Hyperbaric Medicine Unit and Anaesthesia, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia. susannah.sherlock@health.qld.gov.au.
Introduction:
Central nervous system oxygen toxicity (CNS-OT) is an uncommon complication of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT). Different facilities have developed local protocols in an attempt to reduce the risk of CNS-OT. This audit was performed to elucidate which protocols might be of benefit in mitigating CNS-OT and to open discussion on adopting a common protocol for Treatment Table 14 (TT14) to enable future multicentre clinical trials.
Methods:
Audit of CNS-OT events between units using different compression profiles for TT14, performed at 243 kPa with variable durations of oxygen breathing and 'air breaks', to assess whether there is a statistical diference between protocols. Data were collected retrospectively from public and private hyperbaric facilities in Australia and New Zealand between 01 January 2010 and 31 December 2014.
Results:
Eight of 15 units approached participated. During the five-year period 5,193 patients received 96,670 treatments. There were a total of 38 seizures in 33 patients when all treatment pressures were examined. In the group of patients treated at 243 kPa there were a total of 26 seizures in 23 patients. The incidence of seizure per treatment was 0.024% (2.4 per 10,000 treatments) at 243 kPa and the risk per patient was 0.45% (4.5 in 1,000 patients). There were no statistically significant differences between the incidences of CNS-OT using different TT14 protocols in this analysis.
Conclusion:
HBOT is safe and CNS-OT is uncommon. The risk of CNS-OT per patient at 243 kPa was 1 in 222 (0.45%; range 0-1%) and the overall risk irrespective of treatment table was 0.6% (range 0.31-1.8%). These figures are higher than previously reported as they represent individual patient risk as opposed to risk per treatment. The wide disparity of facility protocols for a 243 kPa table without discernible influence on the incidence of CNS-OT rates should facilitate a national approach to consensus.
Related Concept Videos
What is a Nervous System?
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
The Parasympathetic Nervous System
The Sympathetic Nervous System
The Central Dogma
Measurement: Standard Units

